Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36328155›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2023

Implementation of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Assays in the United States.

Cian McCarthy, Shuang Li, Tracy Y Wang, Inbar Raber, Yader Sandoval, Nathaniel R Smilowitz, Jason H Wasfy, Ambarish Pandey, James A de Lemos, Michael C Kontos and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The significance of historical troponin elevation in acute heart failure: Not as reassuring as previously assumed.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Cian McCarthyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: cmccarthy37@partners.org.
Shuang LiDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Tracy Y WangDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Inbar RaberDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Yader SandovalMinneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Nathaniel R SmilowitzLeon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Jason H WasfyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ambarish PandeyDivision of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
James A de LemosDivision of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Michael C KontosDivision of Cardiology, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Fred S AppleDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Hennepin Healthcare/HCMC, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Lori B DanielsDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
L Kristin NewbyDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Allan S JaffeDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
James L JanuzziDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Heart Failure and Biomarker Trials, Baim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USClinical Research Institute · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USDuke University · USHennepin Healthcare Research Institute · USMayo Clinic · USMinneapolis Heart Institute Foundation · USNew York University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging Research Training ProgramT32HL094301 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Marcelo F DI CARLI · 2010 to 2026
$7.8M
Mechanisms of Coronary Microvascular DiseaseK23HL150315 · NHLBI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SMILOWITZ, NATHANIEL ROSSO · 2020 to 2024
$948k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL150315NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL094301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew data exist regarding the implementation of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays in the United States since their approval.

objectivesThis study sought to explore trends in hs-cTn assay implementation over time and assess the association of their use with in-hospital cardiac testing and outcomes.

methodsThe study examined trends in implementation of hs-cTn assays among participating hospitals in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Chest Pain-MI [Myocardial Infarction] Registry from January 1, 2019 through September 30, 2021. Associations among hs-cTn use, use of in-hospital diagnostic imaging, and patient outcomes were assessed using generalized estimating equation models with logistic or gamma distributions.

resultsAmong 550 participating hospitals (N = 251,000), implementation of hs-cTn assays increased from 3.3% in the first quarter of 2019 to 32.6% in the third quarter of 2021 (P

conclusionsImplementation of hs-cTn among U.S. hospitals is increasing, but most U.S. hospitals continue to use less sensitive assays. The use of hs-cTn was associated with modestly shorter length of stay, greater use of echocardiography for NSTE-ACS, and less use of invasive angiography among low-risk patients.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeMyocardial InfarctionBiomarkersChest PainHumansTroponinBiomarkersTroponinchest painhigh-sensitivity cardiac troponin assaysimplementation

Identifiers

PMID36328155
PMCPMC10037558
OpenAlexW4307684550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.