Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36328068›Full record

ArticleBrain research2023

Top-down auditory attention modulates neural responses more strongly in neurotypical than ADHD young adults.

Jasmine A Kwasa, Abigail L Noyce, Laura M Torres, Benjamin N Richardson, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Review of Auditory Attention: Neural Mechanisms, Theories, and Affective Disorders.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jasmine A KwasaNeuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, 1 Silber Way, Boston, MA, 02215, United States. Electronic address: jkwasa@andrew.cmu.edu.
Abigail L NoyceNeuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States.
Laura M TorresDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, 1 Silber Way, Boston, MA, 02215, United States.
Benjamin N RichardsonNeuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States.
Barbara G Shinn-CunninghamNeuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States.

Funding

Individual differences in supra-threshold sound encodingR01DC013825 · NIDCD · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI SHINN-CUNNINGHAM, BARBARA · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
Developing Novel Neural Technologies to Investigate Top-Down Attention in Neurologically and Racially Heterogeneous PopulationsK00NS115331 · NINDS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI Jasmine Kwasa · 2022 to 2026
$329k
Individual Differences in Neural Correlates of Selective Attention within a DiverseAttention PopulationF99NS115331 · NINDS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI KWASA, JASMINE · 2019 to 2020
$80k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013825NINDS NIH HHS F99 NS115331NINDS NIH HHS K00 NS115331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human cognitive abilities naturally vary along a spectrum, even among those we call "neurotypical". Individuals differ in their ability to selectively attend to goal-relevant auditory stimuli. We sought to characterize this variability in a cohort of people with diverse attentional functioning. We recruited both neurotypical (N = 20) and ADHD (N = 25) young adults, all with normal hearing. Participants listened to one of three concurrent, spatially separated speech streams and reported the order of the syllables in that stream while we recorded electroencephalography (EEG). We tested both the ability to sustain attentional focus on a single "Target" stream and the ability to monitor the Target but flexibly either ignore or switch attention to an unpredictable "Interrupter" stream from another direction that sometimes appeared. Although differences in both stimulus structure and task demands affected behavioral performance, ADHD status did not. In both groups, the Interrupter evoked larger neural responses when it was to be attended compared to when it was irrelevant, including for the P3a "reorienting" response previously described as involuntary. This attentional modulation was weaker in ADHD listeners, even though their behavioral performance was the same. Across the entire cohort, individual performance correlated with the degree of top-down modulation of neural responses. These results demonstrate that listeners differ in their ability to modulate neural representations of sound based on task goals, while suggesting that adults with ADHD may have weaker volitional control of attentional processes than their neurotypical counterparts.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityAcoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionElectroencephalographyHearing TestsHumansSpeechYoung AdultAdult ADHDAuditory AttentionEEGN1P3a

Identifiers

PMID36328068
PMCPMC9749882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.