Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36327887›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2022

Pre-hospital prediction of adverse outcomes in patients with suspected COVID-19: Development, application and comparison of machine learning and deep learning methods.

M Hasan, P A Bath, C Marincowitz, L Sutton, R Pilbery, F Hopfgartner, S Mazumdar, R Campbell, T Stone, B Thomas and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

M HasanThe University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Sheffield, United Kingdom. Electronic address: m.hasan@sheffield.ac.uk.
P A BathThe University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Sheffield, United Kingdom; The University of Sheffield, Information School, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
C MarincowitzThe University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Sheffield, United Kingdom.
L SuttonThe University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Sheffield, United Kingdom.
R PilberyYorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Research and Development, Wakefield, United Kingdom.
F HopfgartnerThe University of Koblenz and Landau, Institute for Web Science and Technologies, Koblenz, Germany.
S MazumdarThe University of Sheffield, Information School, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
R CampbellThe University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Sheffield, United Kingdom.
T StoneThe University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Sheffield, United Kingdom.
B ThomasThe University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Sheffield, United Kingdom.
F BellThe University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Sheffield, United Kingdom.
J TurnerThe University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Sheffield, United Kingdom.
K BiggsThe University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Sheffield, United Kingdom.
J PetrieThe University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Sheffield, United Kingdom.
S GoodacreThe University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 infected millions of people and increased mortality worldwide. Patients with suspected COVID-19 utilised emergency medical services (EMS) and attended emergency departments, resulting in increased pressures and waiting times. Rapid and accurate decision-making is required to identify patients at high-risk of clinical deterioration following COVID-19 infection, whilst also avoiding unnecessary hospital admissions. Our study aimed to develop artificial intelligence models to predict adverse outcomes in suspected COVID-19 patients attended by EMS clinicians.

methodLinked ambulance service data were obtained for 7,549 adult patients with suspected COVID-19 infection attended by EMS clinicians in the Yorkshire and Humber region (England) from 18-03-2020 to 29-06-2020. We used support vector machines (SVM), extreme gradient boosting, artificial neural network (ANN) models, ensemble learning methods and logistic regression to predict the primary outcome (death or need for organ support within 30 days). Models were compared with two baselines: the decision made by EMS clinicians to convey patients to hospital, and the PRIEST clinical severity score.

resultsOf the 7,549 patients attended by EMS clinicians, 1,330 (17.6%) experienced the primary outcome. Machine Learning methods showed slight improvements in sensitivity over baseline results. Further improvements were obtained using stacking ensemble methods, the best geometric mean (GM) results were obtained using SVM and ANN as base learners when maximising sensitivity and specificity.

conclusionsThese methods could potentially reduce the numbers of patients conveyed to hospital without a concomitant increase in adverse outcomes. Further work is required to test the models externally and develop an automated system for use in clinical settings.

Indexed as

COVID-19Deep LearningAdultArtificial IntelligenceHospitalsHumansMachine LearningArtificial neural networksCOVID-19Emergency servicesExtreme gradient boostingLogistic regressionStacking ensembleSupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID36327887
PMCPMC9420071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.