Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36327670›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of hygiene and environmental health2023

PFAS levels and determinants of variability in exposure in European teenagers - Results from the HBM4EU aligned studies (2014-2021).

D Richterová, E Govarts, L Fábelová, K Rausová, L Rodriguez Martin, L Gilles, S Remy, A Colles, L Rambaud, M Riou and 23 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Determinants of maternal and neonatal PFAS concentrations: a review.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 8 institutions in 11 countries.

D RichterováSlovak Medical University in Bratislava, Faculty of Public Health, Department of Environmental Medicine, Bratislava, Slovakia.
E GovartsVITO Health, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
L FábelováSlovak Medical University in Bratislava, Faculty of Public Health, Department of Environmental Medicine, Bratislava, Slovakia.
K RausováSlovak Medical University in Bratislava, Faculty of Public Health, Department of Environmental Medicine, Bratislava, Slovakia.
L Rodriguez MartinVITO Health, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
L GillesVITO Health, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
S RemyVITO Health, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
A CollesVITO Health, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
L RambaudDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, Santé Publique France, Saint-Maurice, France.
M RiouDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, Santé Publique France, Saint-Maurice, France.
C GabrielEnvironmental Engineering Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; HERACLES Research Center on the Exposome and Health, Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation, Balkan Center, Greece.
D SarigiannisEnvironmental Engineering Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; HERACLES Research Center on the Exposome and Health, Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation, Balkan Center, Greece; Environmental Health Engineering, Institute of Advanced Study, Pavia, Italy.
S Pedraza-DiazNational Centre for Environmental Health, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain.
J J RamosNational Centre for Environmental Health, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain.
T KosjekJožef Stefan Institute, Department of Environmental Sciences, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
J Snoj TratnikJožef Stefan Institute, Department of Environmental Sciences, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
S LignellSwedish Food Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.
I GyllenhammarSwedish Food Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.
C ThomsenNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
L S HaugNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
M Kolossa-GehringGerman Environment Agency (UBA), GerES V-sub, Germany.
N VogelGerman Environment Agency (UBA), GerES V-sub, Germany.
C FrankenProvincial Institute for Hygiene, Antwerp, Belgium.
N VanlarebekeProvincial Institute for Hygiene, Antwerp, Belgium.
L BruckersBioStat, Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Martelarenlaan 42, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium.
L StewartPublic Health England, Chilton, United Kingdom.
O SepaiPublic Health England, Chilton, United Kingdom.
G SchoetersVITO Health, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
M UhlUmweltbundesamt, Vienna, Austria.
A CastañoNational Centre for Environmental Health, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain.
M Esteban LópezNational Centre for Environmental Health, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain.
T GöenInstitute and Outpatient Clinic of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Ľ Palkovičová MurínováSlovak Medical University in Bratislava, Faculty of Public Health, Department of Environmental Medicine, Bratislava, Slovakia. Electronic address: lubica.murinova@szu.sk.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NOFlemish Institute for Technological Research · BEInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESSlovak Medical University · SKAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRJožef Stefan Institute · SINational Food Administration · SESanté Publique France · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are man-made fluorinated chemicals, widely used in various types of consumer products, resulting in their omnipresence in human populations. The aim of this study was to describe current PFAS levels in European teenagers and to investigate the determinants of serum/plasma concentrations in this specific age group.

methodsPFAS concentrations were determined in serum or plasma samples from 1957 teenagers (12-18 years) from 9 European countries as part of the HBM4EU aligned studies (2014-2021). Questionnaire data were post-harmonized by each study and quality checked centrally. Only PFAS with an overall quantification frequency of at least 60% (PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS and PFNA) were included in the analyses. Sociodemographic and lifestyle factors were analysed together with food consumption frequencies to identify determinants of PFAS exposure. The variables study, sex and the highest educational level of household were included as fixed factors in the multivariable linear regression models for all PFAS and each dietary variable was added to the fixed model one by one and for each PFAS separately.

resultsThe European exposure values for PFAS were reported as geometric means with 95% confidence intervals (CI): PFOS [2.13 μg/L (1.63-2.78)], PFOA ([0.97 μg/L (0.75-1.26)]), PFNA [0.30 μg/L (0.19-0.45)] and PFHxS [0.41 μg/L (0.33-0.52)]. The estimated geometric mean exposure levels were significantly higher in the North and West versus the South and East of Europe. Boys had significantly higher concentrations of the four PFAS compared to girls and significantly higher PFASs concentrations were found in teenagers from households with a higher education level. Consumption of seafood and fish at least 2 times per week was significantly associated with 21% (95% CI: 12-31%) increase in PFOS concentrations and 20% (95% CI: 10-31%) increase in PFNA concentrations as compared to less frequent consumption of seafood and fish. The same trend was observed for PFOA and PFHxS but not statistically significant. Consumption of eggs at least 2 times per week was associated with 11% (95% CI: 2-22%) and 14% (95% CI: 2-27%) increase in PFOS and PFNA concentrations, respectively, as compared to less frequent consumption of eggs. Significantly higher PFOS concentrations were observed for participants consuming offal (14% (95% CI: 3-26%)), the same trend was observed for the other PFAS but not statistically significant. Local food consumption at least 2 times per week was associated with 40% (95% CI: 19-64%) increase in PFOS levels as compared to those consuming local food less frequently.

conclusionThis work provides information about current levels of PFAS in European teenagers and potential dietary sources of exposure to PFAS in European teenagers. These results can be of use for targeted monitoring of PFAS in food.

Indexed as

Alkanesulfonic AcidsEnvironmental PollutantsFluorocarbonsAdolescentAnimalsData CollectionDietFemaleFishesHumansLinear ModelsMaleAlkanesulfonic AcidsEnvironmental PollutantsFluorocarbonsAdolescentsDeterminantsExposureFood consumptionHBM4EUPerfluoroalkyl substances

Identifiers

PMID36327670
PMCPMC9758614
OpenAlexW4308034632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.