ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2022
Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03529110 (A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Active-Controlled Study of DS-8201a), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Active-Controlled Study of DS-8201a (Trastuzumab Deruxtecan), an Anti-HER2 Antibody Drug Conjugate (ADC), Versus Ado Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) for HER2-Positive, Unresectable and/or Metastatic Breast Cancer Subjects Previously Treated With Trastuzumab and Taxane
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Economic evaluation of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in patients with breast cancer: systematic review.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Adverse Event Costs and Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Anticancer Drugs: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- Inetetamab plus camrelizumab and utidelone for pretreated HER2-positive advanced breast cancer: a prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study.BMC medicine · 2026Trial
- Pooled survival and cost-effectiveness analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitors-based for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 lower than 1.Health economics review · 2026Article
- Tumor treating field plus chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: An international cost-effectiveness analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Health-related quality of life in biliary tract cancer clinical trials. The current state and future directions.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of pyrotinib combined with trastuzumab and docetaxel as first-line treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in China.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Cost-utility and price threshold analysis of sacituzumab tirumotecan versus single-agent chemotherapy for previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- International cost-effectiveness analysis of durvalumab consolidation treatment after chemoradiotherapy for patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of polatuzumab vedotin plus chemoimmunotherapy for untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive metastatic breast cancer: cost-effectiveness analysis from Iranian experience.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of cadonilimab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for patients with previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in China.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of antibody-drug conjugates in the treatment of advanced urological cancers: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Real-world efficacy and safety of inetetamab-based therapy in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients with prior exposure to trastuzumab.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the second-line treatment for HR+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line versus second-line use of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy in advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer in China: based on the SONIA trial.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Mirvetuximab soravtansine in platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer with high folate receptor-alpha expression: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2024Article
- A cost-effectiveness analysis of the combination of serplulimab with chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: insights from the ASTRUM-007 trial.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2024Article
- Toripalimab plus chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDESTINY-Breast03 (NCT03529110) was the first global phase III study to assess the antitumor activity of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) compared to trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in 2022. However, the balance between efficacy and cost of T-DXd remains unclear. As a result, the present study's goal is to investigate the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd vs T-DM1 as a second-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive MBC from the US and Chinese payer's perspectives.
methodsA Markov model with a 20-year time horizon was developed to evaluate the overall cost of patient treatment, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and life-years (LYs) in the US and China at WTP levels of 150,000/QALY and 37,653/QALY, respectively (3 times GDP per capita in 2021). Key data were gathered from the US government's official website, the Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, and published literature. To determine the model's stability, a sensitivity analysis was performed. A subgroup analysis was also implemented.
resultsCompared with T-DM1, treatment with T-DXd generated an additional 1.672 QALYs (2.796 LYs), resulting in an ICER of $13,342/QALY (US) and $186,017/QALY (China). The cost of drugs is the most influential factor in the American and Chinese models. Subgroup analysis revealed that the T-DXd and T-DM1 regimens were more cost-effective at reducing the risk of death in the US and Chinese HER2-positive MBC patients.
conclusionT-DXd as second-line treatment could gain more health benefits for HER2-positive MBC patients in comparison with T-DM1, which is considered to be cost-effective in the US but not in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.