Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36327312›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Exploring the challenges to safer prescribing and medication monitoring in prisons: A qualitative study with health care staff.

Esnath Magola-Makina, Aseel S Abuzour, Darren M Ashcroft, James Dunlop, Petra Brown, Richard N Keers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Exploring Medication Safety in Transitions From Prison to Community: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Methods and tools used to assess patient experience with healthcare services in prisons: a scoping review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Exploring Polypharmacy in the BC Correctional Health Setting.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Esnath Magola-MakinaDivision of Pharmacy & Optometry, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0584-2798
Aseel S AbuzourDivision of Pharmacy & Optometry, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Darren M AshcroftDivision of Pharmacy & Optometry, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
James DunlopPatient Safety Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Petra BrownDivision of Pharmacy & Optometry, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Richard N KeersDivision of Pharmacy & Optometry, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health PSTRC-2016-003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionResearch suggests that patients who are prisoners experience greater morbidity, increased health inequalities and frequent preventable harm, compared to the general population. Little is known about the process and influencing factors for safe prescribing in the unique prison environment, which may limit the development efforts to improve the quality of care in prisons. This study aimed to understand the process and challenges associated with prescribing in prisons, explore the causes and impact of these challenges, and explore approaches to improve prescribing safety in prisons.

methodsGrounded theory informed data collection and analysis of a nominal group discussion by seven participants and semi-structured telephone interviews with twenty prison healthcare staff, including GPs, pharmacists, psychiatrists and nurses.

findingsThe underlying complexity of prescribing in prison settings increased the level of challenge and influenced the safety of this process. Multiple contributors to the challenges of safe prescribing were identified (comprising governance and policy; the prison structure; staff retention, training and skill mix; IT systems and interface; polypharmacy and co-morbidity; tradability and patient behaviour) with overarching constructs of variations in practice/policy and the influence of prison culture. Participants identified measures to address these challenges through multi-disciplinary collaborative working, increased consistency in processes, and the need for more innovation and education/training.

conclusionsOur study highlighted that healthcare provision in prisons is unique and needs to tailor the care provided to patients without enforcing a model focused on primary, secondary or tertiary care. Participants emphasised a necessary shift in workplace culture and behaviour change to support improvements. The COM-B model of behaviour change may be effectively applied to develop interventions in organisations that have in-depth understanding of their own unique challenges.

Indexed as

PrisonersPrisonsDelivery of Health CareHealth FacilitiesHumansQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID36327312
PMCPMC9632766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.