Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36327311›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Current practice and barriers in the implementation of ultrasound-based assessment of muscle mass in Japan: A nationwide, web-based cross-sectional study.

Keishi Nawata, Nobuto Nakanishi, Shigeaki Inoue, Keibun Liu, Masafumi Nozoe, Yuko Ono, Isamu Yamada, Hajime Katsukawa, Joji Kotani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bridging the gap in nutrition assessment: Barriers and knowledge impact of an educational session on body composition and energy metabolism.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Keishi NawataDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Occupational and Environmental Health, Yahata-nishi, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8174-2820
Nobuto NakanishiDivision of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Chuo-ward, Kobe, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2394-2688
Shigeaki InoueDivision of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Chuo-ward, Kobe, Japan.
Keibun LiuCritical Care Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland and The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Masafumi NozoeDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Konan Women's University, Higashinada-ku, Kobe, Japan.
Yuko OnoDivision of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Chuo-ward, Kobe, Japan.
Isamu YamadaDivision of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Chuo-ward, Kobe, Japan.
Hajime KatsukawaDepartment of Scientific Research, Japanese Society for Early Mobilization, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Joji KotaniDivision of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Chuo-ward, Kobe, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle mass is an important factor for surviving an illness. Ultrasound has gained increased attention as a muscle mass assessment method because of its noninvasiveness and portability. However, data on the frequency of ultrasound-based muscle mass assessment are limited, and there are some barriers to its implementation. Hence, a web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted on healthcare providers in Japan, which comprised four parts: 1) participant characteristics; 2) general muscle mass assessment; 3) ultrasound-based muscle mass assessment; and 4) the necessity of, interest in, and barriers to its implementation. Necessity and interest were assessed using an 11-point Likert scale, whereas barriers were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, in which "Strongly agree" and "Agree" were counted for the analysis. Of the 1,058 responders, 1,026 participants, comprising 282 physicians, 489 physical therapists, 84 occupational therapists, 120 nurses, and 51 dieticians, were included in the analysis. In total, 93% of the participants were familiar with general muscle mass assessment, and 64% had conducted it. Ultrasound-based muscle mass assessment was performed by 21% of the participants. Necessity and interest scored 7 (6-8) and 8 (7-10), respectively for ultrasound-based muscle mass assessment. The barriers to its implementation included lack of relevant education (84%), limited staff (61%), and absence of fixed protocol (61%). Regardless of the necessity of and interest in ultrasound-based muscle mass assessment, it was only conducted by one-fifth of the healthcare providers, and the most important barrier to its implementation was lack of education.

Indexed as

Physical TherapistsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInternetJapanMusclesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36327311
PMCPMC9632777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.