Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36327279›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Individual costs and community benefits: Collectivism and individuals' compliance with public health interventions.

Suyi Leong, Kimin Eom, Keiko Ishii, Marion C Aichberger, Karolina Fetz, Tim S Müller, Heejung S Kim, David K Sherman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Suyi LeongDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0928-0240
Kimin EomSchool of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-6606-1477
Keiko IshiiDepartment of Cognitive and Psychological Sciences, Graduate School of Informatics, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Marion C AichbergerBerlin Institute for Integration and Migration Research (BIM), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Karolina FetzBerlin Institute for Integration and Migration Research (BIM), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Tim S MüllerBerlin Institute for Integration and Migration Research (BIM), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0761-7535
Heejung S KimDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States of America.
David K ShermanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States of America.
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · USNagoya University · JPSingapore Management University · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differences in national responses to COVID-19 have been associated with the cultural value of collectivism. The present research builds on these findings by examining the relationship between collectivism at the individual level and adherence to public health recommendations to combat COVID-19 during the pre-vaccination stage of the pandemic, and examines different characteristics of collectivism (i.e., concern for community, trust in institutions, perceived social norms) as potential psychological mechanisms that could explain greater compliance. A study with a cross-section of American participants (N = 530) examined the relationship between collectivism and opting-in to digital contact tracing (DCT) and wearing face coverings in the general population. More collectivistic individuals were more likely to comply with public health interventions than less collectivistic individuals. While collectivism was positively associated with the three potential psychological mechanisms, only perceived social norms about the proportion of people performing the public health interventions explained the relationship between collectivism and compliance with both public health interventions. This research identifies specific pathways by which collectivism can lead to compliance with community-benefiting public health behaviors to combat contagious diseases and highlights the role of cultural orientation in shaping individuals' decisions that involve a tension between individual cost and community benefit.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansPandemicsPublic HealthUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36327279
PMCPMC9632888
OpenAlexW4308099133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.