Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36327058›Full record

ArticleEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2023

The prognostic significance of preoperative nutritional/inflammatory markers and clinicopathological features in resectable esophagectomy patients: possibility of nutritional intervention.

Yoshinori Fujiwara, Shunji Endo, Masaharu Higashida, Hisako Kubota, Kazuhiko Yoshimatsu, Tomio Ueno

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoshinori FujiwaraDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan. yyfujiwara@med.kawasaki-m.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-2925-8905
Shunji EndoDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan.
Masaharu HigashidaDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan.
Hisako KubotaDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan.
Kazuhiko YoshimatsuDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan.
Tomio UenoDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan.
Kawasaki Medical School · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreoperative inflammatory or nutritional biomarkers and clinicopathological features may be survival predictors in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

methodsWe included 118 patients with resectable squamous esophageal carcinoma (stages I-IV), assessing preoperative CRP- and albumin-based modified Glasgow prognostic score, the modified controlling nutritional status score, C-reactive protein, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, pathologic stage, and tumor location(s), looking for correlation with overall survival and relapse-free survival. Using univariate and Cox analysis, we selected the most reliable prognostic factors.

resultsFive-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival were 54.9% and 48.5%, respectively. C-reactive protein values correlated negatively with hypoalbuminemia (P = 0.0036). On univariate analysis, tumor stage, invasion depth, location, nodal involvement, albumin, and modified Glasgow prognostic score were significant prognostic factors for overall and recurrence-free survival. Preoperative C-reactive protein was prognostic factor for overall survival, but not for relapse-free survival (P = 0.017, 0.063, respectively). The Cox proportional hazards model showed the modified Glasgow prognostic score to be an independent prognostic factor for relapse-free survival and overall survival after using the stepwise variable selection procedure. Cox analysis including clinicopathological factors and modified Glasgow prognostic scores showed that only tumor location(s) and pathologic stage were independent prognostic factors for overall survival and recurrence-free survival.

conclusionAlthough the modified Glasgow prognostic score is not superior to pathologic stage and tumor location as a biomarker of preoperative nutrition/inflammation and clinicopathological factors, it remains an important prognostic marker in resectable esophageal cancers. Preoperative decreased inflammatory response and improved nutritional status may contribute to prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaBiomarkers, TumorC-Reactive ProteinEsophagectomyHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorC-Reactive ProteinC-reactive proteinDietEsophageal squamous cell carcinomaEsophagus/SUPrognostic factors

Identifiers

PMID36327058
OpenAlexW4307997631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.