Article3D printing in medicine2022
3D printed model for triple negative inflammatory breast cancer.
Article in 3D printing in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design and measurement of 3D-printed variable-morphology and variable-density breast phantoms for mammography and breast CT dose assessment.3D printing in medicine · 2026Article
- The role of 3D culture models and advanced chromatography in exosome research for triple-negative breast cancer.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2025Review
- Development of a flexible liver phantom for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment planning: a useful tool for training & education.3D printing in medicine · 2024Article
- 3D visualization and printing: An "Anatomical Engineering" trend revealing underlying morphology via innovation and reconstruction towards future of veterinary anatomy.Anatomical science international · 2024Review
- Controlateral Symmetrisation in SRM for Breast Cancer: Now or Then? Immediate versus Delayed Symmetrisation in a Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccess to imaging reports and review of the breast imaging directly with a patient with breast cancer helps improve the understanding of disease extent and severity. A 3D printed breast model can further enhance a patient's understanding and communication with the healthcare team resulting in improved patient comprehension and patient input with reduced treatment decision conflict. Furthermore, 3D printed models can facilitate training of residents and fellows involved in the diagnosis and treatment management of breast cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a 3D printed breast tumor model segmented from positron electron tomography/computed tomography and fabricated via desktop vat polymerization as proof of concept for treatment planning for a patient diagnosed with triple negative inflammatory breast carcinoma.
conclusionWe illustrate benefits and indications for 3D printing in the management of breast cancer and specifically inflammatory breast cancer in this case. Fabrication and implementation of 3D printed models enhances patient's understanding and communication with the healthcare team regarding their condition, treatment options and anticipated outcomes. It provides personalized treatment planning by examining patient-specific pathology and the anatomic spatial relationships. Furthermore, 3D printed models facilitate medical education for trainees across disciplines involved in the patient's care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.