Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36326887›Full record

ArticleArchives of dermatological research2023

Utilization of teledermatology services for dermatological diagnoses during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Annie He, Tongil Ti Kim, Khang D Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review of Teledermatology: Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Annie HeDepartment of Dermatology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5939 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7259-4598
Tongil Ti KimNaveen Jindal School of Management, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3277-4337
Khang D NguyenDepartment of Dermatology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5939 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA. nguyenmdpublications@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6806-8202

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about trends in teledermatology adoption and use for managing dermatologic patients, especially changes in use influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic. In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed encounter data from the Healthjump dataset (containing electronic health record data from throughout the USA) for visits from November 2019 to July 2021 with a primary dermatology-related diagnosis. There was a striking rise in teledermatology use with the onset of the pandemic in February 2020, peaking in April 2020 with 2178 teledermatology encounters (32.8% of all encounters). Subsequently, teledermatology use waned. Most teledermatology care was delivered via synchronous means with little use of asynchronous or telephone communication. When compared to those with neoplastic skin diseases, patients with inflammatory skin diseases were more likely to be seen via teledermatology (OR 3.30, 95% CI 3.12-3.49). Certain demographic groups were less likely to receive care via teledermatology, such as men (compared with females, OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.74-0.78) and patients 65 and older (compared with those below 65, OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.57-0.62). Our work shows increased adoption of teledermatology at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic with decreasing use over time. Future efforts are needed to ensure continued and expanded use of a valuable care modality to reach vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

COVID-19DermatologySkin DiseasesTelemedicineFemaleHumansMalePandemicsRetrospective StudiesCOVID-19DermatologyElectronic health recordsTeledermatologyTelehealthTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36326887
PMCPMC9632599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.