Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36326884›Full record

ArticleArchives of microbiology2022

Characterization of the core gut microbiota of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): indication of a putative novel Cetobacterium species and analysis of its potential function on nutrition.

Ziyue Zhang, Zijian Fan, Mengmeng Yi, Zhigang Liu, Xiaoli Ke, Fengying Gao, Jianmeng Cao, Miao Wang, Gang Chen, Maixin Lu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. DietaryFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Application ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ziyue ZhangFishery College, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, 524025, China.
Zijian FanKey Laboratory of Tropical & Subtropical Fishery Resource Application & Cultivation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Aquatic Animal Immune Technology of Guangdong Province, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Guangzhou, 510380, China.
Mengmeng YiKey Laboratory of Tropical & Subtropical Fishery Resource Application & Cultivation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Aquatic Animal Immune Technology of Guangdong Province, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Guangzhou, 510380, China.
Zhigang LiuKey Laboratory of Tropical & Subtropical Fishery Resource Application & Cultivation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Aquatic Animal Immune Technology of Guangdong Province, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Guangzhou, 510380, China.
Xiaoli KeKey Laboratory of Tropical & Subtropical Fishery Resource Application & Cultivation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Aquatic Animal Immune Technology of Guangdong Province, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Guangzhou, 510380, China.
Fengying GaoKey Laboratory of Tropical & Subtropical Fishery Resource Application & Cultivation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Aquatic Animal Immune Technology of Guangdong Province, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Guangzhou, 510380, China.
Jianmeng CaoKey Laboratory of Tropical & Subtropical Fishery Resource Application & Cultivation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Aquatic Animal Immune Technology of Guangdong Province, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Guangzhou, 510380, China.
Miao Wang *Key Laboratory of Tropical & Subtropical Fishery Resource Application & Cultivation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Aquatic Animal Immune Technology of Guangdong Province, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Guangzhou, 510380, China. miaowfly@163.com.
Gang Chen *Fishery College, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, 524025, China. cheng@gdou.edu.cn.
Maixin Lu *Key Laboratory of Tropical & Subtropical Fishery Resource Application & Cultivation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Aquatic Animal Immune Technology of Guangdong Province, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Guangzhou, 510380, China. mx-lu@163.com.
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs · CNGuangdong Ocean University · CN

Funding

China Agriculture Research System of MOF & MARA CARS-46Guangdong Provincial Key R&D Program 2021B0202020001National Natural Science Foundation of China 32102818
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genus Cetobacterium has been considered a dominant group of gut bacteria in many freshwater fish, and members of this genus contribute to anaerobic metabolism. Because of its significant place in the gut of freshwater fish, many studies on Cetobacterium were performed. Those studies mostly focused on the temporal and spatial changes of its abundance in fish intestine, which were affected by food or other environmental conditions. However, only a few studies isolated strains from genus Cetobacterium and reported their characteristics. In the present study, we performed 16S rRNA sequencing of the intestinal mucosa of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and found that Cetobacterium sp. existed widely in the foregut, midgut and hindgut mucosa, and a strain of Cetobacterium was successfully isolated from the gut of tilapia. We sequenced its whole genome and predicted it to be a novel candidate species of Cetobacterium sp. and named it NK01. The size of its genome was 3,095,946 bp, with a guanine + cytosine content of 28.8%. Among the identified genes, 2855 were predicted to be coding DNA sequences, 84 were tRNA and 34 were rRNA. We found that NK01 produced amino acids, including leucine, isoleucine, valine, glycine, alanine, phenylalanine and proline. Strain NK01 could use starch, sucrose, maltose, glucose, and mannose and synthesize and utilize glycogen. INV, GPI, malQ, malZ, sacA, scrK, glgC, glgA and glk, which were related to carbohydrate metabolism, were detected. yiaY and adhE, which oxidize ethanol to acetaldehyde and participate in a variety of metabolic pathways, were also present in the genome. No coding genes directly involved in acetate or butyrate production were detected. NK01 could also catabolize a variety of vitamins, and all genes involved in folate synthesis were detected, including folP, folC, folA and eutT, which converted vitamin B12s into vitamin B12 coenzyme. Here, we investigated the draft genome and in vitro function of Cetobacterium isolated from the intestinal tract of Nile tilapia. The results provided a preliminary understanding of the core microbiota of fish gut.

Indexed as

CichlidsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsEubacterialesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAmino acidCetobacteriumCore microbiotaNile tilapiaWhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID36326884
OpenAlexW4308027668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.