Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36326841›Full record

ReviewClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2023

Network meta-analysis of sacubitril/valsartan for the treatment of essential hypertension.

Yaling Zhang, Xiaoyu Zhao, Hao Huang, Ming Li

Open access · hybridAbstract readReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yaling Zhang *Department of Nephrology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China.
Xiaoyu Zhao *Department of Cardiovascular, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China.
Hao HuangDepartment of Cardiovascular, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China. howardsc@foxmail.com.
Ming LiDepartment of Cardiovascular, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China. lmjy4788@126.com.
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimSacubitril/valsartan has been demonstrated to reduce blood pressure in hypertensive patients, but the best dose remains unclear. We performed this network meta-analysis to determine the comparative efficacy and safety of three available doses of sacubitril/valsartan (i.e., 100, 200, and 400 mg). METHODS AND

resultsWe searched four databases for relevant studies published before January 2022. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the sitting position (msSBP and msDBP) and ambulatory condition (24-h maSBP and maDBP) and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 5474 patients were included. Sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg once daily was slightly better than 400 mg once daily in lowering 24-h maDBP (MD, 1.31 mmHg; 95% CI 0.61-2.01 mmHg), slightly better than 100 mg once daily in lowering 24-h maSBP (MD, - 3.70 mmHg; 95% CI  - 6.22 to - 1.18 mmHg) and 24-h maDBP (MD, - 2.98; 95% CI - 5.11 to - 0.85), and slightly better than Valsartan 160 mg once daily in lowering 24-h maSBP (MD, - 3.23 mmHg; 95% CI, - 5.25 to - 1.21). 400 mg once daily of sacubitril/valsartan was better than 200 mg once daily in lowering msDBP (MD, - 9.38 mmHg; 95% CI - 17.79 to - 0.97 mmHg). Interestingly, 400 mg once daily of sacubitril/valsartan had fewer trial-specified AEs than 200 mg once daily (OR, 0.74; 95%CI 0.55-0.99). There was no statistical difference for the remaining comparisons.

conclusionsIn hypertensive patients, 200 mg once daily of sacubitril/valsartan may exert a greater reduction in ambulatory blood pressure than 100 mg once daily and 200 mg once daily may not be inferior to 400 mg once daily. Moreover, it is not clear that sacubitril/valsartan lowers blood pressure more than an angiotensin receptor blocker. Further trials are required to determine the incremental value of sacubitril/valsartan as an anti-hypertensive agent.

Indexed as

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersHypertensionAminobutyratesAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsBiphenyl CompoundsBlood PressureDrug CombinationsEssential HypertensionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTetrazolesValsartanAminobutyratesAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsBiphenyl CompoundsDrug CombinationssacubitrilTetrazolesValsartanDiastolic blood pressureHypertensionNetwork meta-analysisSacubitril/valsartanSystolic blood pressure

Identifiers

PMID36326841
PMCPMC10293449
OpenAlexW4308000101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.