Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36326742›Full record

Trial reportJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2022

Effectiveness of Tonsillectomy vs Modified Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty in Patients With Tonsillar Hypertrophy and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: The TEAMUP Randomized Clinical Trial.

Joar Sundman, Pia Nerfeldt, Johan Fehrm, Johan Bring, Nanna Browaldh, Danielle Friberg

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02523248 (Randomized Control Study Between Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty and Tonsillectomy in Adult Sleep Apnea Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02523248 naterminatednot on this map

Randomized Control Study Between Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty and Tonsillectomy in Adult Sleep Apnea Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska University HospitalRan2016 to 2022Enrolled100ConditionsObstructive Sleep ApneaArmstonsillectomy, Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Tonsillectomy May Not Be the Answer in All OSA Cases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joar SundmanDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Intervention, and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pia NerfeldtDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Intervention, and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan FehrmDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Intervention, and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan BringStatisticon AB, Uppsala, Sweden.
Nanna BrowaldhDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Intervention, and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Danielle FribergDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEStatisticon (Sweden) · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Modified uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (mUPPP) is a surgical treatment for selected adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Tonsillectomy (TE) alone is a less extensive alternative treatment. Objective: To investigate whether mUPPP is more effective than TE alone in treating adult patients with tonsillar hypertrophy and moderate to severe OSA. Design, Setting, and Participants: This blinded randomized clinical trial compared the effectiveness of mUPPP with TE alone before surgery and 6 months postsurgery in adults with tonsillar hypertrophy (sizes 2, 3, or 4 according to the Friedman staging) and moderate to severe OSA in a university hospital in Stockholm, Sweden. Participants underwent surgery from January 2016 to February 2021; the last postsurgery follow-up was completed in September 2021. Data analyses were performed from January to September 2022. Interventions: mUPPP vs TE alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: Between-group differences on the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS). Results: The study cohort comprised 93 patients (mean [SD] age, 41.6 [9.4] years; 80 [86%] men; race/ethnicity were not considered) with a mean (SD) body mass index of 29.0 (2.8), calculated as weight in kg divided by height in m2. Of these, 90 participants (97%) completed the protocol (mUPPP, n = 45; TE, n = 45). The mean (SD) AHI score (number of events per hour [events/h]) for the mUPPP group decreased by 43%, from 51.0 (22.6) to 28.0 (20.0) events/h; and for the TE group, 56%, from 56.9 (25.1) to 24.7 (22.6) events/h. The mean between-group difference in AHI score was 9.2 events/h (95% CI, 0.5 to 17.9), with a small effect size (Cohen d = 0.44) in favor of TE. For ESS scores, the between-group difference was also small, only 1.1 (95% CI, -1.3 to 3.4; Cohen d = 0.21). Neither difference was considered to be clinically relevant. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial demonstrated that mUPPP was not more effective than TE alone in treating patients with tonsillar hypertrophy and moderate to severe OSA. However, there was a small difference in favor of TE. Because TE alone is less extensive, it could be considered as an alternative to mUPPP in this selected group of patients with OSA. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02523248.

Indexed as

Sleep Apnea, ObstructiveAdultHumansSweden

Identifiers

PMID36326742
PMCPMC9634593
OpenAlexW4308059654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.