ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2023
Translating Academic Drug Discovery Into Clinical Development: A Survey of the Awareness of Regulatory Support and Requirements Among Stakeholders in Europe.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- A roadmap for supporting the development of advanced therapy medicinal products in a European framework.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Review
- Ethics and regulatory guidance to address the challenges encountered in research on rare diseases in a multinational dimension: the experience of a European funded programme.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- The sponsor-proxy model: Bridging basic science discovery and investigator-initiated clinical trials.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Dynamic clinical trial success rates for drugs in the 21st century.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Advancing Regulatory Oversight of Medical Device Trials to Align with Clinical Drug Standards in the European Union.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The European Innovation Network as a hub for medicines innovation in Europe.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2024Article
- Unmet medical needs definition and incentives: stakeholders perspectives on the reform of the EU pharmaceutical legislation.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- The Inevitability Prospects of Regulatory Information Management Software RegDesk to Ease Regulation Approvals.Reviews on recent clinical trials · 2024Article
- International regulatory and publicly-funded initiatives to advance drug repurposing.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Strategic recommendations from the STARS project to foster academic drug development.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2023Article
- Involvement of the European Medicines Agency in multi-stakeholder regulatory science research projects: experiences of staff members and project coordinators.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Access to medicines for rare diseases: A European regulatory roadmap for academia.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Important discoveries by academic drug developers hold the promise of bringing innovative treatments that address unmet medical needs to the market. However, the drug development process has proved to be challenging and demanding for academic researchers, and regulatory challenges are an important barrier to implementing academic findings in clinical practice. European regulators offer varying degrees of support services to help drug developers meet regulatory standards and requirements. "Strengthening Training of Academia in Regulatory Sciences and Supporting Regulatory Scientific Advice" (STARS) is a European Commission-funded consortium aiming to strengthen the training of academics in regulatory science and requirements. Here, we report the results of four surveys that investigated the awareness and utilization of support tools offered by European regulators and identified the regulatory challenges and support needs of researchers. The surveys targeted four main European stakeholders in academic medicines research: academic research groups (706 respondents), academic research centers (99), funding organizations (49), and regulators (22). The results show that while European regulators provide various regulatory support tools, less than half of the responding academic researchers were aware of these tools and many experienced challenges in reaching a sufficient level of regulatory knowledge. There was a general lack of understanding of the regulatory environment that was aggravated by poor communication between stakeholders. The results of this study form a foundation for an improved European medicines regulatory network, in which regulatory challenges faced by academia are tackled.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.