Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36326573›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2023

Translating Academic Drug Discovery Into Clinical Development: A Survey of the Awareness of Regulatory Support and Requirements Among Stakeholders in Europe.

Marko J Kallio, Viktoriia Starokozhko, Eleonora Agricola, Manja Burggraf, Anne Heß, Wolfgang Ballensiefen, Wiebke Löbker, Yoana Nuevo, Anna M G Pasmooij, Peter G M Mol and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Marko J Kallio *Finnish Medicines Agency, Helsinki, Finland.
Viktoriia Starokozhko *Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eleonora AgricolaItalian Medicines Agency, Rome, Italy.
Manja BurggrafPaul Ehrlich Institute, Langen, Germany.
Anne HeßFederal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, Bonn, Germany.
Wolfgang BallensiefenGerman Aerospace Center, Project Management Agency, Health, Innovation for Disease Related Research and Personalised Medicine, Bonn, Germany.
Wiebke LöbkerFederal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, Bonn, Germany.
Yoana NuevoSpanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices, Madrid, Spain.
Anna M G PasmooijDutch Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0641-3829
Peter G M MolDutch Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4262-3180
STARS consortium
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices · DEDeutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) · DEEuropean Medicines Agency · NLFinnish Medicines Agency Fimea · FIItalian Medicines Agency · ITMedicines Evaluation Board · NLPaul Ehrlich Institut · DEUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Important discoveries by academic drug developers hold the promise of bringing innovative treatments that address unmet medical needs to the market. However, the drug development process has proved to be challenging and demanding for academic researchers, and regulatory challenges are an important barrier to implementing academic findings in clinical practice. European regulators offer varying degrees of support services to help drug developers meet regulatory standards and requirements. "Strengthening Training of Academia in Regulatory Sciences and Supporting Regulatory Scientific Advice" (STARS) is a European Commission-funded consortium aiming to strengthen the training of academics in regulatory science and requirements. Here, we report the results of four surveys that investigated the awareness and utilization of support tools offered by European regulators and identified the regulatory challenges and support needs of researchers. The surveys targeted four main European stakeholders in academic medicines research: academic research groups (706 respondents), academic research centers (99), funding organizations (49), and regulators (22). The results show that while European regulators provide various regulatory support tools, less than half of the responding academic researchers were aware of these tools and many experienced challenges in reaching a sufficient level of regulatory knowledge. There was a general lack of understanding of the regulatory environment that was aggravated by poor communication between stakeholders. The results of this study form a foundation for an improved European medicines regulatory network, in which regulatory challenges faced by academia are tackled.

Indexed as

Drug and Narcotic ControlDrug DiscoveryEuropeHumansSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36326573
PMCPMC10099080
OpenAlexW4308058757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.