ReviewJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2023
External Hardware and Sensors, for Improved MRI.
Review in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reducing Motion Artifact in High Resolution 7 T MRI Using the Magnetic Resonance Minimal Motion ("MR-MinMo") Head Stabilization Device.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Head Motion Correction Based on Pilot Tone Signals in MRI: A Referenceless Method.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026Article
- 4D Flow MRI at 0.6 T-Self-Gating Versus Camera-Based Respiratory Binning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Quantifying hepatic arterial blood flow with 4D flow MRI: an in vivo feasibility and repeatability study.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Contrast-optimized basis functions for self-navigated motion correction in quantitative MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Enhancing cardiac MRI reliability at 3 T using motion-adaptive BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Advantages of BioMatrix respiratory gating in free-breathing three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a prospective comparative study.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Analysis of Personalized Cardiovascular Drug Therapy: From Monitoring Technologies to Data Integration and Future Perspectives.Biosensors · 2025Review
- US & MR/CT Image Fusion with Markerless Skin Registration: A Proof of Concept.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Beat Pilot Tone (BPT): Simultaneous MRI and RF motion sensing at arbitrary frequencies.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Free-breathing MRI techniques for fat and RMagma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- Preliminary Experience with Three Alternative Motion Sensors for 0.55 Tesla MR Imaging.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Subject-specific timing adaption in time-encoded arterial spin labeling imaging.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Complex engineered systems are often equipped with suites of sensors and ancillary devices that monitor their performance and maintenance needs. MRI scanners are no different in this regard. Some of the ancillary devices available to support MRI equipment, the ones of particular interest here, have the distinction of actually participating in the image acquisition process itself. Most commonly, such devices are used to monitor physiological motion or variations in the scanner's imaging fields, allowing the imaging and/or reconstruction process to adapt as imaging conditions change. "Classic" examples include electrocardiography (ECG) leads and respiratory bellows to monitor cardiac and respiratory motion, which have been standard equipment in scan rooms since the early days of MRI. Since then, many additional sensors and devices have been proposed to support MRI acquisitions. The main physical properties that they measure may be primarily "mechanical" (eg acceleration, speed, and torque), "acoustic" (sound and ultrasound), "optical" (light and infrared), or "electromagnetic" in nature. A review of these ancillary devices, as currently available in clinical and research settings, is presented here. In our opinion, these devices are not in competition with each other: as long as they provide useful and unique information, do not interfere with each other and are not prohibitively cumbersome to use, they might find their proper place in future suites of sensors. In time, MRI acquisitions will likely include a plurality of complementary signals. A little like the microbiome that provides genetic diversity to organisms, these devices can provide signal diversity to MRI acquisitions and enrich measurements. Machine-learning (ML) algorithms are well suited at combining diverse input signals toward coherent outputs, and they could make use of all such information toward improved MRI capabilities. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.