Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36326422›Full record

ReviewTurkish journal of medical sciences2022

Comparison of intraoperative biliary anastomosis stenting technique in living-donor liver transplantation: Review of 41 patients.

Ramazan Dönmez, Şener Balas, Ufuk Utku Göktuğ, Ertan Emek, Yaman Tokat

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 82% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ramazan DönmezVocational School of Health Services, Fenerbahçe University İstanbul, Turkey.
Şener BalasDepartment of General Surgery, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences Ankara, Turkey.
Ufuk Utku GöktuğDepartment of General Surgery, Keçiören Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences Ankara, Turkey.
Ertan EmekDepartment of General Surgery Medikal Park Göztepe Hospital, İstanbul Turkey.
Yaman TokatDepartment of General Surgery Acıbadem Fulya Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Ministry of Health · TRFenerbahçe University · TRIstanbul Eye Hospital · TRSema Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiliary fistula is one of the most important complications in liver transplantation. Complications can vary from simple local peritonitis to death, and various techniques have been described to prevent them. In this study, we compared two different stenting methods used in biliary tract anastomosis in living-donor liver transplantation.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from 41 living-donor liver transplantations that were performed due to endstage liver failure between August 2019 and November 2020. Patients were grouped according to the stenting technique used in biliary anastomosis. Postoperative biliary tract complications were investigated.

resultsBiliary fistulas were observed in 2 (7.4%) patients in the internal stent group, while 4 (28.5) fistulas were observed in the external stent group. Biliary tract stricture was observed in 2 (7.4%) patients in the internal stent group, but there was no statistical difference in complications. The preoperative MELD score (p = 0.038*) was found to be statistically significant in regard to developing complications. DISCUSSION: Our study did not show the effect of stenting methods used during biliary anastomosis on the development of complications. However, larger randomized controlled studies are needed.

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationLiving DonorsAnastomosis, SurgicalBile DuctsHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesStentsbiliarycomplicationLivertransplantation

Identifiers

PMID36326422
PMCPMC10388071
OpenAlexW4291826564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.