Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36326369›Full record

Observational studyTurkish journal of medical sciences2022

Remdesivir treatment for patients with moderate to severe COVID-19.

İmran Hasanoğlu, Rahmet Güner, İlhami Çelik, Fikret Kanat, Ayşe Batırel, Gülçin Dizman Telli, Esma Eren, Dilek Sevgi Yıldız, İlkay Bozkurt, Kadriye Yaşar Kart and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

İmran HasanoğluDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Rahmet GünerDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
İlhami ÇelikDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Health Sciences, Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey.
Fikret KanatDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
Ayşe BatırelDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kırdar City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Gülçin Dizman TelliDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Esma ErenDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Health Sciences, Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey.
Dilek Sevgi YıldızDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Health Sciences, İstanbul Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Education and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
İlkay BozkurtDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.
Kadriye Yaşar KartDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Health Sciences, Bakırkoy Dr Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Sevtap ŞenoğluDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Health Sciences, Bakırkoy Dr Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Esra KazakDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey.
Rıdvan KaraaliDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Aysel ÇelikbaşDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hitit University, Çorum, Turkey.
Hüsnü PullukçuDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.
Arif Atahan ÇağatayDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Serhat ÜnalDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Şebnem ErdinçDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Fehmi TabakDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Ahmet GülDepartment of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Emine AlpMinistry of Health, Ankara, Turkey.
Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ · TREge University · TRSelçuk University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemdesivir, which was first developed for the treatment of Ebola disease but failed to meet expectations, has become hope in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to evaluate risk factors for mortality and prognosis of adult moderate/severe COVID-19 patients treated with remdesivir, and safety and tolerability of 5 days of remdesivir treatment.

methodsThis multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in 14 centers in Turkey. Pregnancy or breastfeeding, multiorgan failure, or usage of vasopressors for septic shock, ALT > 5 × the upper limit of the normal range, or eGRF <30 mL/min or dialysis and receiving favipiravir were the exclusion criteria of the study.

resultsAmong 500 patients, 494 patients were included in the study. On admission, 392 (79.3%) patients had moderate and 102 (20.6%) patients had severe COVID-19. The 28-day mortality was 10.1%. The median of the scores of the seven-category ordinal scale assessed on days 0, 3, 5, 7 were 4 and 3 on day 14. When the survival status of the patients was evaluated according to the time between the remdesivir start date and the end date of the symptoms, no statistically significant difference was found between the medians of the groups (p = 0.404). In multivariable analysis, age (OR, 1.05; 95%CI, 1.02-1.08; p = 0.003), SpO2 level on admission (OR, 3.03; 95%CI, 1.35-6.81; p = 0.007), heart rate (OR, 2.48; 95%CI, 1.01-6.07; p = 0.047), follow-up site at the hospital (clinic/ICU) (OR, 26.4; 95%CI, 11.6-60.17; p < 0.001) were independently associated with increased mortality. Grade 3 adverse event (AE) was observed in 4 (0.8%) patients. None of the patients experienced grade 4 or 5 AEs. DISCUSSION: Remdesivir is a safe and well-tolerated drug and older age, low SpO2 level on admission, tachycardia, and ICU admission are independently associated with increased mortality among patients with moderate/severe COVID-19 receiving remdesivir treatment.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAdenosine MonophosphateAdultAlanineAntiviral AgentsHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral AgentsremdesivirantiviralCOVID-19mortalityremdesivirtreatment

Identifiers

PMID36326369
PMCPMC10387889
OpenAlexW4291826562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.