Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36326090›Full record

ArticlePrehospital and disaster medicine2022

Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management Workforce Development Strategies: Delphi Consensus Study.

Kevin K C Hung, Makiko K MacDermot, Emily Y Y Chan, Sonoe Mashino, Satchit Balsari, Gregory R Ciottone, Francesco Della Corte, Marcelo F Dell'Aringa, Shinichi Egawa, Bettina D Evio and 11 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Prehospital and disaster medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Kevin K C HungAccident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8706-7758
Makiko K MacDermotAccident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Emily Y Y ChanAccident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Sonoe MashinoResearch Institute of Nursing Care for People and Community, University of Hyogo, Akashi, Japan.
Satchit BalsariBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MassachusettsUSA.
Gregory R CiottoneBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MassachusettsUSA.
Francesco Della CorteCRIMEDIM-Center for Research and Training in Disaster Medicine, Humanitarian Aid and Global Health, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
Marcelo F Dell'AringaCRIMEDIM-Center for Research and Training in Disaster Medicine, Humanitarian Aid and Global Health, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
Shinichi EgawaDivision of International Cooperation for Disaster Medicine, International Research Institute of Disaster Science (IRIDeS), Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan.
Bettina D EvioCollege of Nursing, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Alexander HartBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MassachusettsUSA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0910-2316
Tadashi IshiiDepartment of Educational and Support for Regional Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Miyagi, Japan.
Luca RagazzoniCRIMEDIM-Center for Research and Training in Disaster Medicine, Humanitarian Aid and Global Health, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2528-4375
Hiroyuki SasakiDivision of International Cooperation for Disaster Medicine, International Research Institute of Disaster Science (IRIDeS), Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan.
Joseph Harold WallineAccident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chi S WongCollaborating Centre for Oxford University and Chinese University of Hong Kong for Disaster and Medical Humanitarian Response (CCOUC), School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Saurabh DalalWorld Health Organization Country Office, New Delhi, India.
Ryoma KayanoWorld Health Organization Centre for Health Development, Kobe, Japan.
Jonathan AbrahamsDisaster Risk Reduction and Resilience Unit, Health Security Preparedness Department, WHO Health Emergencies Program, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Qudsia HudaDisaster Risk Reduction and Resilience Unit, Health Security Preparedness Department, WHO Health Emergencies Program, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Colin A GrahamAccident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealth workforce development is essential for achieving the goals of an effective health system, as well as establishing national Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management (Health EDRM). STUDY

objectiveThe objective of this Delphi consensus study was to identify strategic recommendations for strengthening the workforce for Health EDRM in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) and high-income countries (HIC).

methodsA total of 31 international experts were asked to rate the level of importance (one being strongly unimportant to seven being strongly important) for 46 statements that contain recommendations for strengthening the workforce for Health EDRM. The experts were divided into a LMIC group and an HIC group. There were three rounds of rating, and statements that did not reach consensus (SD ≥ 1.0) proceeded to the next round for further ranking.

resultsIn total, 44 statements from the LMIC group and 34 statements from the HIC group attained consensus and achieved high mean scores for importance (higher than five out of seven). The components of the World Health Organization (WHO) Health EDRM Framework with the highest number of recommendations were "Human Resources" (n = 15), "Planning and Coordination" (n = 7), and "Community Capacities for Health EDRM" (n = 6) in the LMIC group. "Policies, Strategies, and Legislation" (n = 7) and "Human Resources" (n = 7) were the components with the most recommendations for the HIC group.

conclusionThe expert panel provided a comprehensive list of important and actionable strategic recommendations on workforce development for Health EDRM.

Indexed as

DisastersHealth WorkforceDelphi TechniqueHumansRisk Managementdeveloped countriesdeveloping countriesdisastershealth workforcerisk management

Identifiers

PMID36326090
PMCPMC9726469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.