Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36325724›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2022

The use of BCAP in Finland: toward correct classification rate.

Paavilainen Eija, Ellonen Noora, Mielityinen Laura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 82% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paavilainen EijaFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Ellonen NooraFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Mielityinen LauraFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Tampere University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFurther validation of Brief Child Abuse Potential (BCAP) inventory, for setting the correct classification rate.

methodsData collection from potential abusers (

resultsThere were no differences between likely abusers and the general population. Among both groups, 6% had elevated abuse risk and there were no differences in appearance of dimensions including in the abuse scale.

conclusionsAssuming child abuse based on known risk factors is not enough, when setting the correct classification rate. We need more accurate knowledge about the abuse, and the family life situation in general. However, assessing risk factors of child maltreatment systematically with the BCAP, can still serve as a fruitful basis of assessing parents' needs and worries as the basis for providing support what they need.

Indexed as

Child AbuseChildFinlandHumansParentsRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesChild abuse riskparental worriesrisk assessmentuniversal servicesvalidation process of Brief Child Abuse Potential inventory

Identifiers

PMID36325724
PMCPMC9848277
OpenAlexW4308053955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.