Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36325586›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2022

Human in vitro neurocardiac coculture (ivNCC) assay development for evaluating cardiac contractility modulation.

Akshay Narkar, Tromondae K Feaster, Maura Casciola, Ksenia Blinova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. HumanFrontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akshay NarkarCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3649-1230
Tromondae K FeasterCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2102-8742
Maura CasciolaCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0203-0847
Ksenia BlinovaCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1123-3152
United States Food and Drug Administration · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two of the most prominent organ systems, the nervous and the cardiovascular systems, are intricately connected to maintain homeostasis in mammals. Recent years have shown tremendous efforts toward therapeutic modulation of cardiac contractility and electrophysiology by electrical stimulation. Neuronal innervation and cardiac ganglia regulation are often overlooked when developing in vitro models for cardiac devices, but it is likely that peripheral nervous system plays a role in the clinical effects. We developed an in vitro neurocardiac coculture (ivNCC) model system to study cardiac and neuronal interplay using human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) technology. We demonstrated significant expression and colocalization of cardiac markers including troponin, α-actinin, and neuronal marker peripherin in neurocardiac coculture. To assess functional coupling between the cardiomyocytes and neurons, we evaluated nicotine-induced β-adrenergic norepinephrine effect and found beat rate was significantly increased in ivNCC as compared to monoculture alone. The developed platform was used as a nonclinical model for the assessment of cardiac medical devices that deliver nonexcitatory electrical pulses to the heart during the absolute refractory period of the cardiac cycle, that is, cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy. Robust coculture response was observed at 14 V/cm (5 V, 64 mA), monophasic, 2 ms pulse duration for pacing and 20 V/cm (7 V, 90 mA) phase amplitude, biphasic, 5.14 ms pulse duration for CCM. We observed that the CCM effect and kinetics were more pronounced in coculture as compared to cardiac monoculture, supporting a hypothesis that some part of CCM mechanism of action can be attributed to peripheral nervous system stimulation. This study provides novel characterization of CCM effects on hiPSC-derived neurocardiac cocultures. This innervated human heart model can be further extended to investigate arrhythmic mechanisms, neurocardiac safety, and toxicity post-chronic exposure to materials, drugs, and medical devices. We present data on acute CCM electrical stimulation effects on a functional and optimized coculture using commercially available hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes and neurons. Moreover, this study provides an in vitro human heart model to evaluate neuronal innervation and cardiac ganglia regulation of contractility by applying CCM pulse parameters that closely resemble clinical setting. This ivNCC platform provides a potential tool for investigating aspects of cardiac and neurological device safety and performance.

Indexed as

Heart FailureInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsAnimalsCardiotonic AgentsCoculture TechniquesHumansMammalsMyocardial ContractionMyocytes, CardiacCardiotonic Agentscardiac contractility modulation CCMcardiomyocyteshuman induced pluripotent stem cellsneurocardiac cocultureneurons

Identifiers

PMID36325586
PMCPMC9630755
OpenAlexW4307994132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.