Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36325528›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Screening of potential biomarkers in peripheral blood of patients with depression based on weighted gene co-expression network analysis and machine learning algorithms.

Zhe Wang, Zhe Meng, Che Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhe WangSchool of Chinese Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Zhe MengSchool of Chinese Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Che ChenSchool of Chinese Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of depression has been increasing worldwide in recent years, posing a heavy burden on patients and society. However, the diagnostic and therapeutic tools available for this disease are inadequate. Therefore, this research focused on the identification of potential biomarkers in the peripheral blood of patients with depression. Methods: The expression dataset GSE98793 of depression was provided by the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gds). Initially, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected in GSE98793. Subsequently, the most relevant modules for depression were screened according to weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). Finally, the identified DEGs were mapped to the WGCNA module genes to obtain the intersection genes. In addition, Gene Ontology (GO), Disease Ontology (DO), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) functional enrichment analyses were conducted on these genes. Moreover, biomarker screening was carried out by protein-protein interaction (PPI) network construction of intersection genes on the basis of various machine learning algorithms. Furthermore, the gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), immune function analysis, transcription factor (TF) analysis, and the prediction of the regulatory mechanism were collectively performed on the identified biomarkers. In addition, we also estimated the clinical diagnostic ability of the obtained biomarkers, and performed Mfuzz expression pattern clustering and functional enrichment of the most potential biomarkers to explore their regulatory mechanisms. Finally, we also perform biomarker-related drug prediction. Results: Differential analysis was used for obtaining a total of 550 DEGs and WGCNA for obtaining 1,194 significant genes. Intersection analysis of the two yielded 140 intersection genes. Biological functional analysis indicated that these genes had a major role in inflammation-related bacterial infection pathways and cardiovascular diseases such as atherosclerosis. Subsequently, the genes S100A12, SERPINB2, TIGIT, GRB10, and LHFPL2 in peripheral serum were identified as depression biomarkers by using machine learning algorithms. Among them, S100A12 is the most valuable biomarker for clinical diagnosis. Finally, antidepressants, including disodium selenite and eplerenone, were predicted. Conclusion: The genes S100A12, TIGIT, SERPINB2, GRB10, and LHFPL2 in peripheral serum are viable diagnostic biomarkers for depression. and contribute to the diagnosis and prevention of depression in clinical practice.

Indexed as

biomarkersblooddepressionmachine learningweighted correlation network analysis

Identifiers

PMID36325528
PMCPMC9621316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.