Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36325506›Full record

ArticleBehavioral ecology and sociobiology2022

Common permutation methods in animal social network analysis do not control for non-independence.

Jordan D A Hart, Michael N Weiss, Lauren J N Brent, Daniel W Franks

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
24.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jordan D A HartCentre for Research in Animal Behaviour, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Michael N WeissCentre for Research in Animal Behaviour, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Lauren J N Brent *Centre for Research in Animal Behaviour, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Daniel W Franks *Departments of Biology and Computer Science, University of York, York, UK.
University of Exeter · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Neurogenomics of Vulnerability and Resilience to Mental Health Syndromes in Response to Extreme Life EventsR01MH118203 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PLATT, MICHAEL L · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The non-independence of social network data is a cause for concern among behavioural ecologists conducting social network analysis. This has led to the adoption of several permutation-based methods for testing common hypotheses. One of the most common types of analysis is nodal regression, where the relationships between node-level network metrics and nodal covariates are analysed using a permutation technique known as node-label permutations. We show that, contrary to accepted wisdom, node-label permutations do not automatically account for the non-independences assumed to exist in network data, because regression-based permutation tests still assume exchangeability of residuals. The same assumption also applies to the quadratic assignment procedure (QAP), a permutation-based method often used for conducting dyadic regression. We highlight that node-label permutations produce the same Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00265-022-03254-x.

Indexed as

Animal social network analysisMixed modelsNode-label permutationsPermutation tests

Identifiers

PMID36325506
PMCPMC9617964
OpenAlexW4307592573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.