Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36325497›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical imaging science2022

A call to action; national survey of teaching radiology curriculum to medical students.

Scott Andrew Rohren, Serageldin Kamel, Zoha A Khan, Parth Patel, Sammar Ghannam, Akilan Gopal, Peggy H Hsieh, Khaled M Elsayes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical imaging science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Learning Anatomy With Radiology: A Systematic Review.Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Scott Andrew RohrenSchool of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States.
Serageldin KamelLymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Zoha A KhanSchool of Medicine, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, Texas, United States.
Parth PatelSchool of Medicine, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, Texas, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3193-7296
Sammar GhannamDepartment of Radiology, UT Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States.
Akilan GopalSchool of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, United States.
Peggy H HsiehOffice of Educational Programs, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, United States.
Khaled M ElsayesDepartment of Abdominal Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Radiology and medical imaging are important yet often an underrepresented facet of medical education. Notably, there is concern among radiologists that students do not receive enough radiology exposure and that they struggle to interpret image findings on entering residency. Therefore, this survey aims to identify how medical students perceive the radiology curriculum and to determine gaps in delivery. Material and Methods: Students were recruited from United States (US) medical schools and given a 21-question survey assessing their perception of the radiology curriculum as well as asking about their confidence levels regarding medical imaging. The inclusion criteria were age >18 and enrolled in US medical school. The surveys were completed in April-July 2020 by students across the US. Objective parameters were measured as percentage correct, while subjective parameters used a 4-point Likert scale. Results: A total of 472 medical students across 31 medical schools completed the surveys with a response rate of 69%. Responses represented all class years within medical schools and showed equal distribution among the future career plans. Students responded that didactic lectures were the most common teaching method and that radiologists were their primary teachers during preclinical education. Students were unfamiliar with the American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria with 65% responding they had never heard of it and 33% reporting that they have heard of it but never used it. In assessing students' perceptions of radiology education, 72% of students responded that they received too little, and 28% of students responded, "Just right." <1% of students responded that there was "Too much" radiology in their curriculum. Conclusion: Radiologists are increasing their educational representation in medical school curricula. Despite this, radiology continues to be under-represented with students desiring more exposure to medical imaging. Integrating the student's perceptions with existing curricula suggests that efforts should focus on increasing awareness of which studies are appropriate and teaching students how to systematically interpret an image.

Indexed as

AppropriatenessCurriculumEducationPerspectiveTeaching

Identifiers

PMID36325497
PMCPMC9610045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.