ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022
Effects of microvibration stimulation on developmental potential of discarded germinal vesicle oocytes of human.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Detection of the effect of microvibrational stimulation on human discarded immature oocytes by single-cell transcriptome sequencing technology.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This research aims to study the effects of continuous microvibration stimulation on the parthenogenetic development of human germinal vesicle oocytes. Methods: Ninety-five discarded germinal vesicle oocytes from intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment (ICSI) cycles performed at Amcare Women's & Children's Hospital between January and December 2021 were used for conventional static culture as well as 10 Hz microvibration culture. We investigated the differences between the two groups in terms of oocyte maturation rate, parthenogenetic activation rate, and parthenogenetic blastocyst formation rate. Results: The static culture and 10 Hz microvibration culture of 95 oocytes showed that the parthenogenetic blastocyst formation rate in the microvibration culture group was significantly higher than those in the traditional static culture group. Conclusion: A continuous microvibration stimulation can significantly improve the parthenogenetic developmental potential of human immature oocytes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.