Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36325450›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Comparing the effects of endometrial injury in the luteal phase and follicular phase on

Yang Wang, Zhiqin Bu, Linli Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Value analysis of serum β -HCG, AMH, and P/EPakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yang WangReproductive Medical Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhiqin BuReproductive Medical Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Linli HuReproductive Medical Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Several studies have shown that endometrial injury improves clinical pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing Method: This prospective cohort study was conducted from January 2015 to September 2021, and a total of 487 patients were included. All included patients had a history of a failed implantation cycle. They were divided into two groups: the FP group ( Results: First, in unselected patients, the implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate were comparable between the LP and FP groups. However, in patients with a history of ≥ 2 failed transfer cycles, the implantation rate was significantly higher in the LP group than in FP group (43.09% versus 33.33%, Conclusion: Endometrial injury improves pregnancy outcomes when performed in the luteal phase compared with the follicular phase in patients with a history of ≥ 2 failed transfer cycles but not in unselected patients.

Indexed as

Follicular PhaseLuteal PhaseFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansMalePregnancyProspective StudiesSemenTreatment Outcomeendometrial injuryfollicular phasein vitro fertilizationluteal phasepregnancy outcome

Identifiers

PMID36325450
PMCPMC9618956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.