Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36325436›Full record

ArticleDigital health

A pragmatic methodical framework for the user-centred development of an electronic process support for the sleep laboratory patients' management.

Maria Zerlik, Ian-C Jung, Tony Sehr, Fabian Hennings, Christian Kamann, Moritz D Brandt, Martin Sedlmayr, Brita Sedlmayr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria ZerlikInstitute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany.
Ian-C JungInstitute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7562-2707
Tony SehrDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Fabian HenningsOncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Christian KamannInstitute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany.
Moritz D BrandtDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Martin SedlmayrInstitute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany.
Brita SedlmayrInstitute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6159-7822

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Limited capacities and ineffective care pathways result in long waiting times for patients and sporadic treatment controls in sleep medicine. As one objective of the 'Telesleep Medicine' project, a portal should be developed, which supports sleep specialists in an efficient and resource-saving patient management. On account of the limited project timeframe, the 'classical' user-centred design and evaluation methods could not be comprehensively implemented. Therefore, a pragmatic methodical framework was developed. Methods: For the iterative development of the portal, a combination of low-cost and quick-to-implement methods was used. In chronological order, these were: context interviews, personas, the development of an as-is model, a web search of design standards and good design aspects of similar systems, the development of a to-be model, the creation of an overarching mind map, and the iterative creation of mockups with simplified usability walkthroughs. Results: The feasibility of the pragmatic methodological framework for the development of a prototype for the portal was demonstrated. The used method combination resulted in a prototype based on the needs and requirements of the sleep specialists, taking into account their specific workflow and the technical implementation conditions. Conclusions: The presented pragmatic methodological framework can be a valuable resource for developers of comparable projects. The combination of methods worked well together regarding the limited timeframe and resources for concept development. For the future, we plan to implement and test the portal in the clinical field and thus enrich our framework with additional methods.

Indexed as

disease managementhealth informaticsmedical informatics applicationspatient care managementsleep disordersTelemedicineuser-centred design

Identifiers

PMID36325436
PMCPMC9618751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.