ArticleHealth systems (Basingstoke, England)2022
An automated machine learning tool for breast cancer diagnosis for healthcare professionals.
Article in Health systems (Basingstoke, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The paper proposes a hybrid metaheuristic algorithm known as harmony search and simulated annealing (HS-SA) for accurate and precise breast malignancy disclosure by integrating harmony search (HS) and simulated annealing (SA) optimisation methods. An enhanced wavelet-based contourlet transform (WBCT) procedure for mining the highlights of the region of interest (ROI) is explored, that allows execution upgradation over other standard procedures. The anticipated HS-SA algorithm aims to reduce the feature dimensions and assemble at the unparalleled optimal feature subset. The SVM classifier fed with the picke.d feature subsets and assisted by varied kernel functions upheld its classification capacities in contrast with the conformist machine learning classification and optimisation methods. The portrayed computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) model is confronted by evaluating its learning capability on two different breast mammographic datasets i) benchmark BCDR-F03 dataset and ii) local mammographic dataset. Preliminary propagations, experimental outcomes, and quantifiable assessments likewise demonstrate that the proposed model is pragmatic and favourable for the automated breast malignancy findings with optimal performance and fewer overheads. The discoveries show that the proposed CAD system (HS-SA+Kernel SVM) is superior to various characterisation accuracy techniques with an accuracy of 99.89% for the local mammographic dataset and 99.76% for benchmark BCDR-F03 dataset, AUC of 99.41% for the local mammographic dataset and 99.21% for reference BCDR-F03 dataset while keeping the element space restricted to only seven feature subsets and computational prerequisites as low as is judicious.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.