ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022
Characteristics of cerebral blood flow in an Eastern sample of multiple sclerosis patients: A potential quantitative imaging marker associated with disease severity.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Multi-omics and high-spatial-resolution omics: deciphering complexity in neurological disorders.GigaScience · 2025Pooled it
- Multi-omics profiling reveals peripheral blood biomarkers of multiple sclerosis: implications for diagnosis and stratification.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system that is rare in China. At present, there are no widespread quantitative imaging markers associated with disease severity in MS. Despite several previous studies reporting cerebral blood flow (CBF) changes in MS, no consensus has been reached. In this study, we enrolled 30 Eastern MS patients to investigate CBF changes in different brain regions using the arterial spin labeling technique and their relationship with disease severity. The average CBF in MS patients were higher than those in health controls in various brain regions except cerebellum. The results indicated that MS patients with strongly increased CBF showed worse disease severity, including higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores and serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) values than those with mildly increased CBF in the parietal lobes, temporal lobes, basal ganglia, and damaged white matter (DWM). From another perspective, MS patients with worse disease severity (higher EDSS score and sNfL values, longer disease duration) showed increased CBF in parietal lobes, temporal lobes, basal ganglia, normal-appearing white matter (NAWM), and DWM. Correlation analysis showed that there was a strong association among CBF, EDSS score and sNfL. MS patients with strongly increased CBF in various brain regions had more ratio in relapsing phase than patients with mildly increased CBF. And relapsing patients showed significantly higher CBF in some regions (temporal lobes, left basal ganglia, right NAWM) compared to remitting patients. In addition, MS patients with cognitive impairment had higher CBF than those without cognitive impairment in the right parietal lobe and NAWM. However, there were no significant differences in CBF between MS patients with and without other neurologic dysfunctions (e.g., motor impairment, visual disturbance, sensory dysfunction). These findings expand our understanding of CBF in MS and imply that CBF could be a potential quantitative imaging marker associated with disease severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.