Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36325185›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary human sciences2022

Cultural variation in running techniques among non-industrial societies.

Ian J Wallace, Thomas S Kraft, Vivek V Venkataraman, Helen E Davis, Nicholas B Holowka, Alexandra R Harris, Daniel E Lieberman, Michael Gurven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary human sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ethnokinesiology: towards a neuromechanical understanding of cultural differences in movement.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ian J WallaceDepartment of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1837-5260
Thomas S KraftDepartment of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Vivek V VenkataramanDepartment of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Helen E DavisDepartment of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Nicholas B HolowkaDepartment of Anthropology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0593-7524
Alexandra R HarrisDepartment of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Daniel E LiebermanDepartment of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Michael GurvenDepartment of Anthropology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.

Funding

Brain atrophy, cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's in low CVD-risk populationRF1AG054442 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI FINCH, CALEB E, GURVEN, MICHAEL DOUGLAS · 2017 to 2020
$8.8M
The Human Life Course and the Biodemography of AgingR01AG024119 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI GURVEN, MICHAEL DOUGLAS, KAPLAN, HILLARD S · 2004 to 2015
$7.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG024119NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG054442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research among non-industrial societies suggests that body kinematics adopted during running vary between groups according to the cultural importance of running. Among groups in which running is common and an important part of cultural identity, runners tend to adopt what exercise scientists and coaches consider to be good technique for avoiding injury and maximising performance. In contrast, among groups in which running is not particularly culturally important, people tend to adopt suboptimal technique. This paper begins by describing key elements of good running technique, including landing with a forefoot or midfoot strike pattern and leg oriented roughly vertically. Next, we review evidence from non-industrial societies that cultural attitudes about running associate with variation in running techniques. Then, we present new data from Tsimane forager-horticulturalists in Bolivia. Our findings suggest that running is neither a common activity among the Tsimane nor is it considered an important part of cultural identity. We also demonstrate that when Tsimane do run, they tend to use suboptimal technique, specifically landing with a rearfoot strike pattern and leg protracted ahead of the knee (called overstriding). Finally, we discuss processes by which culture might influence variation in running techniques among non-industrial societies, including self-optimisation and social learning.

Indexed as

foot strikekinematicsoverstridePhysical activitysocial learningTsimane

Identifiers

PMID36325185
PMCPMC9624512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.