ReviewJTO clinical and research reports2022
Quality of Life After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy or Surgery for Early-Stage NSCLC: A Systematic Review.
Review in JTO clinical and research reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Changes in quality of life of early-stage lung cancer patients undergoing sublobar resection: a systematic review.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Addition of pulsed electric field ablation to SBRT for lung tumors: effect on health-related quality of life.Lung cancer management · 2026Article
- Nationwide trends in radiotherapy use among older patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer in Japan, 2013-2022.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Treatment Outcomes for Malignant Peripheral Lung Tumours: A Prospective Single-Centre Comparison of Thermal Ablation, Surgery, and Radiotherapy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Is SBRT the optimal first-line treatment for operable early-stage NSCLC in elderly patients?Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Review
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of breathing exercises effects on lung function and quality of life in postoperative lung cancer patients.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Long-Term Survival and Failure Outcomes of Single-Fraction Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Early Stage NSCLC.JTO clinical and research reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Anxiety, depression, and quality of life in postoperative non-small cell lung cancer patients under the intervention of cognitive-behavioral stress management.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quality of life (QOL) is a key consideration for patients with early-stage NSCLC choosing between treatment options. Currently, it is not well established whether stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or surgery offers superior QOL in early-stage NSCLC. The objective of this systematic review is to summarize the prospective literature on QOL in patients with early-stage NSCLC after treatment with SBRT or surgery. A comprehensive literature review using PubMed and EMBASE was performed in April 2022. Prospective studies evaluating QOL data across multiple time points in patients with early-stage NSCLC after SBRT or surgery were included. A total of 25 studies involving 1597 SBRT patients and 1652 surgery patients met the inclusion criteria. Across most studies, QOL remained stable after treatment with SBRT. After surgery, QOL initially decreased; however, it often returned to baseline in the next 6 to 12 months. Utilization of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and sublobar resection reduced the magnitude of the initial decrease in QOL after surgery and led to faster recovery to baseline. Owing to the heterogeneity of patient populations between studies evaluating SBRT versus surgery, direct comparisons between the two treatments remain difficult to make. Clinicians should appropriately counsel patients with this information to help guide patient-centered discussions on choosing the optimal treatment modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.