ArticleHeliyon2022
Can public participation promote regional green innovation?--Threshold effect of environmental regulation analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The impact of environmental regulations on the upgrading of the industrial structure: Evidence from China.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Can digital transformation change a firm's green innovation strategy? Evidence from China's heavily polluting industries.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Administrative monopoly regulation and environmental innovation: An analysis based on China's asymmetric market structure.Heliyon · 2024Article
- A clean road to international trade: Environmental regulations and the cleanliness of export enterprises.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Green innovation is the fundamental approach to harmonize economic and environmental sustainability. Public participation plays a crucial role in solving the problems of "government failure" and "market failure" in regional green innovation. Based on three perspectives: direct public participation, indirect public participation, and ENGOs participation, this paper takes 30 provinces in China from 2010 to 2019 as samples, constructs panel fixed-effects models and adopts multiple linear regressions to investigates the impact of public participation on regional green innovation. The results show that all three types of public participation have a positive impact on regional green innovation, among which ENGOs' participation has the greatest impact. The effect of direct public participation on green innovation is significantly positive in developed regions but insignificant in underdeveloped regions, while the impact of ENGOs participation is the opposite. The conclusion is still valid after a series of endogeneity and robustness tests. Besides, the threshold regression tests reveal that the impacts of public participation on green innovation shows a threshold effect depending on the intensity of environmental regulation, and only when the intensity of environmental regulation is greater than 0.7495 can public participation play the most effective role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.