Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36325140›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

Transformer maze for the evaluation of the learning and memory in rodents.

Elena Filatova

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Elena FilatovaSechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, pr. Toreza 44, 94223, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Currently, different types of mazes are used to assess spatial learning and memory of rodents. The typical disadvantage is the inability to separate and exclude coincidences of the result of random choice with the correct one. The other problem is the impossibility of knowing whether the animal is guided by particular cues of the environment, or a map. New method: Our novel transformer maze can be used to test learning and memory of rodents and their navigation. It is a multiple T-maze with passages in the interior walls. Its modular design allows to quickly change routes. The task can include external signals; for example, the colors of the interior walls, or it can be used without any cues. Results: We compared Wistar and dopamine transporter heterozygous (DAT-HET) rats' behavior in this novel paradigm using the black color of the wall as a cue. Entering a cul-de-sac compartment was considered an error. While Wistar rats learned the rule abruptly with the total number of errors rapidly decreasing, DAT-HET rats' errors decreased gradually. We suppose that this reflects different strategies: insightful learning behavior is typical for Wistar rats, and trial-and-error learning is typical for DAT-HET rats. Comparison with existing methods: The diversity of the chains of choices gives us confidence that trained animals do not make a choice randomly and are guided precisely by the cues. Moreover, we propose to use the same arena for a task with route-based navigation without any cues, and for a task with a visible and invisible feeder to study the path integration navigation within one box. Conclusions: We suggest that the transformer maze could be a valuable tool for behavioral and pharmacological research to study learning, memory and navigation mechanisms.

Indexed as

BehaviorMazeRat

Identifiers

PMID36325140
PMCPMC9619002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.