Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36325026›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2022

Endophytes and their potential in biotic stress management and crop production.

Parul Chaudhary, Upasana Agri, Anuj Chaudhary, Ashish Kumar, Govind Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Antifungal Potential ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Decoding the rhizosphere microbiome againstFrontiers in microbiomes · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Parul ChaudharyGovind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India.
Upasana AgriGovind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India.
Anuj ChaudharyShobhit University, Gangoh, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ashish KumarGovind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India.
Govind KumarIndian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Lucknow, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biotic stress is caused by harmful microbes that prevent plants from growing normally and also having numerous negative effects on agriculture crops globally. Many biotic factors such as bacteria, fungi, virus, weeds, insects, and nematodes are the major constrains of stress that tends to increase the reactive oxygen species that affect the physiological and molecular functioning of plants and also led to the decrease in crop productivity. Bacterial and fungal endophytes are the solution to overcome the tasks faced with conventional farming, and these are environment friendly microbial commodities that colonize in plant tissues without causing any damage. Endophytes play an important role in host fitness, uptake of nutrients, synthesis of phytohormone and diminish the injury triggered by pathogens

Indexed as

biocontrolbiotic stressendophytesplant growthsustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID36325026
PMCPMC9618965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.