ArticleClinical kidney journal2022
Is there sex disparity in vascular access at dialysis initiation in France? A mediation analysis using data from the Renal Epidemiology and Information Network registry.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examining factors associated with catheter-defined unplanned dialysis initiation: a UK Renal Registry analysis.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Gender disparities in Swedish specialized nephrology care.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Sex and Cause-Specific Mortality among US Adults Receiving Maintenance Dialysis: National US Cohort Study 2000-2021.Kidney360 · 2025Article
- Association between Cognitive Impairment and Malnutrition in Hemodialysis Patients: Two Sides of the Same Coin.Nutrients · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study was conducted to estimate the direct effect of sex on the proportion of hemodialysis (HD) catheters used at dialysis initiation and to investigate whether predialysis care or socioeconomic status acted as a mediator of the sex effect. Methods: Patients who started dialysis between January 1, 2017, and June 30, 2018, in France were included using the data of the Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) registry. We performed logistic regression to study the association between sex and the proportion of HD catheters used. A mediation analysis with a counterfactual approach was carried out to evaluate whether there was an indirect effect of sex through the proxies of predialysis care {hemoglobin, albumin levels, glomerular filtration rate [GFR] at dialysis initiation} and socioeconomic status. Because an interaction between sex and social deprivation has been identified, we performed a subgroup analysis on deprived and nondeprived patients. Results: The study included 16 032 patients, and the sex ratio (male to female) was 10 405:5627. In the multivariable analysis, women were associated with a greater risk of starting dialysis with a catheter {odds ratio [OR], 1.32 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23-1.42]}. There was an indirect effect of sex on the proportion of HD catheters through proxies for predialysis care {albuminemia <30 g/L [OR, 1.08 (95% CI: 1.05-1.10)], hemoglobin <11 g/dL [OR, 1.03 (95% CI: 1.02-1.04)], glomerular filtration rate <7 mL/min [OR, 1.05 (95% CI: 1.04-1.07)]}. Among deprived patients, there was no direct effect of sex on catheter proportion. Conclusions: Women were associated with a higher risk of starting dialysis through an HD catheter. The effect of sex was mediated by predialysis care, particularly for deprived patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.