Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36325004›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2022

Increased mortality after kidney transplantation in mildly frail recipients.

María José Pérez-Sáez, Carlos E Arias-Cabrales, Dolores Redondo-Pachón, Carla Burballa, Anna Buxeda, Anna Bach, Anna Faura, Ernestina Junyent, Ester Marco, Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Frailty Prevalence and Characterization Among Kidney Transplant Candidates in Spain: A Multicenter Study.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

María José Pérez-SáezNephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8601-2699
Carlos E Arias-CabralesNephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Dolores Redondo-PachónNephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Carla BurballaNephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna BuxedaNephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna BachNephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna FauraNephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Ernestina JunyentNephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Ester MarcoPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation Department, Parc de Salut Mar (Hospital del Mar-Hospital de l'Esperança), Rehabilitation Research Group, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Leocadio Rodríguez-MañasGeriatrics Department, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6551-1333
Marta CrespoNephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Julio PascualNephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
FRAIL-MAR Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Physical Frailty Phenotype (PFP) is the most used frailty instrument among kidney transplant recipients, classifying patients as pre-frail if they have 1-2 criteria and as frail if they have ≥3. However, different definitions of robustness have been used among renal patients, including only those who have 0 criteria, or those with 0-1 criteria. Our aim was to determine the impact of one PFP criterion on transplant outcomes. Methods: We undertook a retrospective study of 296 kidney transplant recipients who had been evaluated for frailty by PFP at the time of evaluating for transplantation. Results: Only 30.4% of patients had 0 criteria, and an additional 42.9% showed one PFP criterion. As PFP score increased, a higher percentage of women and cerebrovascular disease were found. Recipients with 0-1 criteria had lower 1-year mortality after transplant than those with ≥2 (1.8% vs 10.1%), but this difference was already present when we only considered those who scored 0 (mortality 1.1%) and 1 (mortality 2.4%) separately. The multivariable analysis confirmed that one PFP criterion was associated to a higher risk of patient death after kidney transplantation [hazard ratio 3.52 (95% confidence interval 1.03-15.9)]. Conclusions: Listed kidney transplant candidates frequently show only one PFP frailty criterion. This has an independent impact on patient survival after transplantation.

Indexed as

frailty phenotypeFriedsurvivaltransplant

Identifiers

PMID36325004
PMCPMC9613422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.