Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36324992›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry global open science2021

Identifying Subgroups of Major Depressive Disorder Using Brain Structural Covariance Networks and Mapping of Associated Clinical and Cognitive Variables.

Xiao Yang, Poornima Kumar, Lisa D Nickerson, Yue Du, Min Wang, Yayun Chen, Tao Li, Diego A Pizzagalli, Xiaohong Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. What Is Precision Psychotherapy?The Journal of medicine and philosophy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiao YangPsychiatric Laboratory and Mental Health Center, the State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Poornima KumarCenter for Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts.
Lisa D NickersonDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Yue DuPsychiatric Laboratory and Mental Health Center, the State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Min WangPsychiatric Laboratory and Mental Health Center, the State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yayun ChenPsychiatric Laboratory and Mental Health Center, the State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Tao LiPsychiatric Laboratory and Mental Health Center, the State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Diego A PizzagalliCenter for Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts.
Xiaohong MaPsychiatric Laboratory and Mental Health Center, the State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Identifying data-driven subtypes of major depressive disorder (MDD) holds promise for parsing the heterogeneity of MDD in a neurobiologically informed way. However, limited studies have used brain structural covariance networks (SCNs) for subtyping MDD. Methods: This study included 145 unmedicated patients with MDD and 206 demographically matched healthy control subjects, who underwent a structural magnetic resonance imaging scan and a comprehensive neurocognitive battery. Patterns of structural covariance were identified using source-based morphometry across both patients with MDD and healthy control subjects. K-means clustering algorithms were applied on dysregulated structural networks in MDD to identify potential MDD subtypes. Finally, clinical and neurocognitive measures were compared between identified subgroups to elucidate the profile of these MDD subtypes. Results: Source-based morphometry across all individuals identified 28 whole-brain SCNs that encompassed the prefrontal, anterior cingulate, and orbitofrontal cortices; basal ganglia; and cerebellar, visual, and motor regions. Compared with healthy control subjects, individuals with MDD showed lower structural network integrity in three networks including default mode, ventromedial prefrontal cortical, and salience networks. Clustering analysis revealed two MDD subtypes based on the patterns of structural network abnormalities in these three networks. Further profiling revealed that patients in subtype 1 had younger age of onset and more symptom severity as well as greater deficits in cognitive performance than patients in subtype 2. Conclusions: Overall, we identified two MDD subtypes based on SCNs that differed in their clinical and cognitive profile. Our results represent a proof-of-concept framework for leveraging these large-scale SCNs to parse heterogeneity in MDD.

Indexed as

BiotypesCANTABClusteringMajor depressionSource-based morphometryStructural covariance networks

Identifiers

PMID36324992
PMCPMC9616319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.