Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36324935›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2022

Percutaneous iliosacral screw insertion with only outlet and inlet fluoroscopic view for unstable pelvic ring injuries: Clinical and radiological outcomes.

Mohammad Zarei, Mersad Moosavi, Sajjad Saghebdoust, Milad Shafizadeh, Mohsen Rostami

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07571798 (The Difference of Two and Three Fluoroscopic Views of Sacrum for Percutaneous Sacroiliac Screw Insertion in High Energy Posterior Pelvic Ring Injured Patients, a Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07571798 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Difference of Two and Three Fluoroscopic Views of Sacrum for Percutaneous Sacroiliac Screw Insertion in High Energy Posterior Pelvic Ring Injured Patients, a Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChonburi hospitalRan2026 to 2026Enrolled16ConditionsHigh-energy Trauma, Sacral Fractures, Posterior Pelvic Ring InjuryArmsPercutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation using two or three fluoroscopic views
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of spinopelvic fixation and iliosacral screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injuries.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammad ZareiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Mersad MoosaviSpine Center of Excellence, Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Sajjad SaghebdoustSports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Milad ShafizadehSpine Center of Excellence, Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Mohsen RostamiSpine Center of Excellence, Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation in posterior pelvic ring fractures is challenging and commonly performed under fluoroscopy or navigation techniques. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of percutaneous iliosacral screw implantation under fluoroscopy guidance with only inlet and outlet views. Methods: This retrospective study included 58 consecutive unstable posterior pelvic injury patients (36 sacral fractures and 22 sacroiliac joint disruptions) treated with percutaneous iliosacral screws between January 2015 and November 2019. Acceptable inlet radiographs show the anterior cortex of the S1 body superimposed on the S2 body. Acceptable outlet radiographs show the superior pubic symphysis at the level of the S2 foramen and visualize the S1 and S2 sacral foramina. In our technique, the screw was inserted at the inferior half of the outlet view and the posterior half of the inlet view. The time needed for screw insertion and the radiation exposure time was recorded. Intra and postoperative complications were documented. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans assessed screw position. Results: In total, 69 iliosacral screws were inserted in 58 patients. In postoperative CT scans, the screw position was assessed, 89.8% were in a secure position, and 10.2% had malposition. The mean operation time per screw was 21.18 min and the mean fluoroscopy time per screw was 112 s. There was no evidence of wound infection or iatrogenic neurovascular injury. No reoperation was performed. Conclusion: Percutaneous iliosacral screws can be placed using the only outlet and inlet fluoroscopic views with comparable radiological and clinical outcomes to the conventional method.

Indexed as

Inlet viewOutlet viewPelvic ring fracturePercutaneous iliosacral screwSacral fracture

Identifiers

PMID36324935
PMCPMC9610688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.