ArticleContraception: X2022
Health providers' perspectives on contraceptive use in rural Northwest Tanzania: A qualitative study.
Article in Contraception: X, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: In Tanzania, contraceptive use is limited, particularly in rural communities and even among women who would like to delay childbearing. This paper aims to present health providers' perspectives on populations seeking contraception and barriers that could be addressed to increase access to and uptake of contraception, given their interface with large portions of their communities. Study Design: We conducted 18 in-depth interviews with providers stationed at health dispensaries in six rural villages in northwest Tanzania. Two investigators independently coded interviews using a stepwise process to achieve consensus on prevalent topics. Results: Three topics emerged from our analysis: (1) nature of clients seeking contraception; (2) barriers to uptake of contraception; and (3) the role of secrecy in obtaining and using contraception. Health providers reported that married women with children were the most frequent users of contraception, alongside some single women, men, sex workers, and students. Barriers to contraception included lack of supplies and trained staff, misconceptions and fears, stigma, and unsupportive partners. Providers observed that contraception was often used secretly. They reported surreptitious visits and described clients' preferential use of discreet methods. Providers respected and supported clients' desires to keep visits confidential. Conclusion: Our data suggest maintaining high stocks of discreet contraceptive methods and deploying more trained staff to dispensaries could increase availability and access to contraceptives. At the community level, more education campaigns are warranted to address barriers, especially those related to stigma. Implications: Our work highlights the need for additional contraceptive methods that are easy to administer and discreet for women who must maintain secrecy. Future studies of the effectiveness of interventions and new contraceptives should obtain healthcare providers' perspectives, as they can provide important insights to service provision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.