ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Congenitally corrected transposition with left ventricular outflow obstruction and cardiac malposition: One-and-a-half ventricular repair vs. Fontan pathway?
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pathogenesis and Surgical Treatment of Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries (ccTGA): Part III.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study was to assess the mid-term results of the one-and-a-half ventricular repair (hemi-Mustard and bidirectional Glenn procedures combined with the Rastelli procedure) and Fontan pathway for correcting congenitally corrected transposition of great artery (ccTGA) patients with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) and cardiac malposition. Methods: In this retrospective study, 74 consecutive ccTGA with LVOTO and cardiac malposition underwent the one-and-a-half ventricular repair (group A; 33 cases) and Fontan operation (group B; 41 cases) between October 2011 and March 2018. The Median follow-up time was 49 (20-84) and 42 (7-85) months in groups A and B, respectively. To estimate excise tolerance the 6-min walk test (MWT) was performed. Results: No in-hospital death. Compared with group A, group B have significantly less CPB, mechanical ventilation time, and intensive care unit stay, but prolonged pleural effusions developed more frequently in Group B. The survival probability was 90.2% (95% CI, 80.2-100%) and 97.2% (95% CI, 92-100%) at 7 years ( Conclusions: For correction of ccTGA with LVOTO and cardiac malposition, the one-and-a-half ventricular repair had superior midterm heart function and excise tolerance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.