ArticleCerebral circulation - cognition and behavior2021
Longitudinal changes in the control mechanisms for blood pressure and cerebral blood flow in Alzheimer's disease: Secondary results of a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leukoaraiosis: Epidemiology, Imaging, Risk Factors, and Management of Age-Related Cerebral White Matter Hyperintensities.Journal of stroke · 2024Review
- Antihypertensives in dementia: Good or bad for the brain?Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) are key mechanisms involved in the homeostasis of blood pressure (BP) and cerebral blood flow. We assessed changes in these mechanisms in Alzheimer's disease (AD) during a 1.5 year follow-up. Methods: In this secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial we measured beat-to-beat BP, heart rate, and cerebral blood flow velocity at baseline, 0.5 and 1.5 years, during: rest (spontaneous oscillations), repeated sit-stand maneuvers (induced oscillations), an orthostatic challenge, and hypo- and hypercapnia. dCA was estimated using transfer function analysis and the autoregulatory index on spontaneous and induced oscillations. BRS was estimated by calculating the heart rate response to BP changes during induced oscillations. Linear mixed models were used to assess changes over time. Results: 56 patients were included (mean age:73 ± 6 years, 57% female). BRS did not change over time. dCA parameters showed small changes after 0.5 years, suggestive of a reduction in efficiency (e.g. higher gain [linear mixed effect model: B = 0.09, SE = 0.03, Discussion: In this sample of patients with dementia due to AD we found no evidence that dCA or BRS become impaired during AD progression. This paves the way for further studies that investigate the safety and benefits of antihypertensive treatment in patients with AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.