Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36324698›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2022

Occurrence Rate of Cyclops Lesion After Anatomic Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction: Comparison Between Remnant Tissue Preservation and Resection Methods.

Ryosuke Hishimura, Eiji Kondo, Yuki Suzuki, Masatake Matsuoka, Koji Iwasaki, Tomohiro Onodera, Daisuke Momma, Tomonori Yagi, Kazunori Yasuda, Norimasa Iwasaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ryosuke HishimuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Eiji KondoCentre for Sports Medicine, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Yuki SuzukiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Masatake MatsuokaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Koji IwasakiDepartment of Functional Reconstruction for the Knee Joint, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Tomohiro OnoderaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Daisuke MommaCentre for Sports Medicine, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Tomonori YagiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yagi Orthopaedic Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Kazunori YasudaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yagi Orthopaedic Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Norimasa IwasakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The occurrence rate of cyclops lesion after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with remnant tissue preservation remains unclear. Hypothesis: The study hypotheses were as follows: (1) the occurrence rate of cyclops lesion will be comparable between the remnant-preserving and remnant-resecting ACL reconstruction methods, and (2) there will be no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the remnant-preserving and remnant-resecting procedures. Methods: This retrospective comparative study involved 177 patients who underwent unilateral anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts from 2014 to 2018 at our hospital. According to the Crain classification of ACL remnant tissue, 98 patients with remnant types I, II, or III underwent the remnant-preserving procedure (group A), and the remaining 79 patients with remnant type IV underwent the remnant-resecting procedure (group B). All patients underwent second-look arthroscopy. Patients were evaluated according to arthroscopic and clinical results at postoperative 15.2 ± 8.4 months (mean ± SD). Statistical comparisons between groups were made using the paired Student Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Results: At second-look arthroscopy, the incidence of cyclops lesions was significantly higher in group B than in group A (29.1% vs 13.3%; Conclusion: In this cohort of patients undergoing double-bundle ACL reconstruction, resection of the ACL remnant was associated with a significantly higher rate of cyclops lesion formation when compared with preservation of the remnant.

Indexed as

cyclops lesiondouble-bundle ACL reconstructionremnant tissue preservationsecond-look arthroscopy

Identifiers

PMID36324698
PMCPMC9620259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.