Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36324592›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy for resectable mucosal melanoma.

Joel Ho, Jane Mattei, Michael Tetzlaff, Michelle D Williams, Michael A Davies, Adi Diab, Isabella C Glitza Oliva, Jennifer McQuade, Sapna P Patel, Hussein Tawbi and 19 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mucosal Melanoma: An Overview of Recent Therapies.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Joel HoDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Jane MatteiOncology Department, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Michael TetzlaffDivision of Dermatopathology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, United States.
Michelle D WilliamsDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Michael A DaviesDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Adi DiabDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Isabella C Glitza OlivaDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Jennifer McQuadeDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Sapna P PatelDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Hussein TawbiDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Michael K WongDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Sarah B FisherDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Ehab HannaDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Emily Z KeungDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Merrick RossDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Roi WeiserDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Shirley Y SuDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Michael FrumovitzDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Larissa A MeyerDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Amir JazaeriDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Curtis A PettawayDepartment of Urologic Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
B Ashleigh GuadagnoloDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Andrew J BishopDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Devarati MitraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Ahsan FarooqiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Roland BassettDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Silvana FariaDepartment of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Priyadharsini NagarajanDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Rodabe N AmariaDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USHospital Moinhos de Vento · BRUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center SPORE in MelanomaP50CA221703 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI GLITZA, ISABELLA CLAUDIA · 2019 to 2023
$10.3M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR003168 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MILLER, CHARLES C · 2019 to 2023
$4.9M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003168NCI NIH HHS P50 CA221703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibition (CPI) has recently demonstrated impressive outcomes in patients with stage 3 cutaneous melanoma. However, the safety, efficacy, and outcome of neoadjuvant CPI in patients with mucosal melanoma (MM) are not well studied as MM is a rare melanoma subtype. CPI such as combination nivolumab and ipilimumab achieves response rates of 37-43% in unresectable or metastatic MM but there is limited data regarding the efficacy of these agents in the preoperative setting. We hypothesize that neoadjuvant CPI is a safe and feasible approach for patients with resectable MM. Method: Under an institutionally approved protocol, we identified adult MM patients with resectable disease who received neoadjuvant anti-PD1 +/- anti-CTLA4 between 2015 to 2019 at our institution. Clinical information include age, gender, presence of nodal involvement or satellitosis, functional status, pre-treatment LDH, tumor mutation status, and treatment data was collected. Outcomes include event free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), pathologic response rate (PRR), and grade ≥3 toxicities. Results: We identified 36 patients. Median age was 62; 58% were female. Seventy-eight percent of patients received anti-PD1 + anti-CTLA4. Node positive disease or satellite lesions was present at the time of treatment initiation in 47% of patients. Primary sites of disease were anorectal (53%), urogenital (25%), head and neck (17%), and esophageal (6%). A minority of patients did not undergo surgery due to complete response (n=3, 8%) and disease progression (n=6, 17%), respectively. With a median follow up of 37.9 months, the median EFS was 9.2 months with 3-year EFS rate of 29%. Median OS had not been reached and 3-year OS rate was 55%. ORR was 47% and PRR was 35%. EFS was significantly higher for patients with objective response and for patients with pathologic response. OS was significantly higher for patients with pathologic response. Grade 3 toxicities were reported in 39% of patients. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant CPI for resectable MM is a feasible approach with signs of efficacy and an acceptable safety profile. As there is currently no standard approach for resectable MM, this study supports further investigations using neoadjuvant therapy for these patients.

Indexed as

immunotherapymelanomamucosal melanomaneoadjuvantresectable

Identifiers

PMID36324592
PMCPMC9618687
OpenAlexW4306381835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.