Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36324583›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

AI-based chest CT semantic segmentation algorithm enables semi-automated lung cancer surgery planning by recognizing anatomical variants of pulmonary vessels.

Xiuyuan Chen, Hao Xu, Qingyi Qi, Chao Sun, Jian Jin, Heng Zhao, Xun Wang, Wenhan Weng, Shaodong Wang, Xizhao Sui and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Advances in the Basic Sciences in Thoracic Oncology in the Last 20 Years and Their Translational Impact.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Xiuyuan ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hao XuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qingyi QiDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chao SunDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jian JinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Heng ZhaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xun WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wenhan WengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shaodong WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xizhao SuiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhenfan WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chenyang DaiThoracic Surgery Department, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Muyun PengThoracic Surgery Department, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Dawei WangInstitute of Advanced Research, Infervision Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Zenghao HaoInstitute of Advanced Research, Infervision Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Yafen HuangInstitute of Advanced Research, Infervision Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Xiang WangThoracic Surgery Department, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Liang DuanThoracic Surgery Department, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Yuming ZhuThoracic Surgery Department, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Nan HongDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Fan YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The recognition of anatomical variants is essential in preoperative planning for lung cancer surgery. Although three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction provided an intuitive demonstration of the anatomical structure, the recognition process remains fully manual. To render a semiautomated approach for surgery planning, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based chest CT semantic segmentation algorithm that recognizes pulmonary vessels on lobular or segmental levels. Hereby, we present a retrospective validation of the algorithm comparing surgeons' performance. Methods: The semantic segmentation algorithm to be validated was trained on non-contrast CT scans from a single center. A retrospective pilot study was performed. An independent validation dataset was constituted by an arbitrary selection from patients who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy in three institutions during Apr. 2020 to Jun. 2021. The golden standard of anatomical variants of each enrolled case was obtained via expert surgeons' judgments based on chest CT, 3-D reconstruction, and surgical observation. The performance of the algorithm is compared against the performance of two junior thoracic surgery attendings based on chest CT. Results: A total of 27 cases were included in this study. The overall case-wise accuracy of the AI model was 82.8% in pulmonary vessels compared to 78.8% and 77.0% for the two surgeons, respectively. Segmental artery accuracy was 79.7%, 73.6%, and 72.7%; lobular vein accuracy was 96.3%, 96.3%, and 92.6% by the AI model and two surgeons, respectively. No statistical significance was found. In subgroup analysis, the anatomic structure-wise analysis of the AI algorithm showed a significant difference in accuracies between different lobes (p = 0.012). Higher AI accuracy in the right-upper lobe (RUL) and left-lower lobe (LLL) arteries was shown. A trend of better performance in non-contrast CT was also detected. Most recognition errors by the algorithm were the misclassification of LA Conclusion: The semantic segmentation algorithm achieves the recognition of the segmental pulmonary artery and the lobular pulmonary vein. The performance of the model approximates that of junior thoracic surgery attendings. Our work provides a novel semiautomated surgery planning approach that is potentially beneficial to lung cancer patients.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencelung cancerpulmonary vesselsemantic segmentationsurgery planning

Identifiers

PMID36324583
PMCPMC9621115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.