Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36324564›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2022

Frailty and long-term survival of patients with ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kemin Li, Rutie Yin, Zhengyu Li

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kemin LiThe Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Rutie YinThe Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhengyu LiThe Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Frailty has been related with poor prognosis of various diseases, including ovarian cancer. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between frailty and long-term survival of patients with ovarian cancer. Methods: Relevant cohort studies were retrieved by search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane's Library, and Web of Science electronic databases. Two authors independently performed literature search, data collection, and statistical analyses. A random-effect model incorporating the possible influence of heterogeneity was used to pool the results. Results: Nine cohort studies including 2497 women with confirmed diagnosis of ovarian cancer contributed to the meta-analysis, and 536 (21.5%) of them were with high frailty. The median follow-up durations varied between 24 and 69 months. Compared to patients with low or non-frailty, OC patients with high frailty were associated with poor overall survival (risk ratio [RR]: 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41 to 1.85, p < 0.001; I Conclusion: High frailty may be an independent risk factor of poor survival in women with ovarian cancer. Evaluating frailty may be important for predicting the prognosis and determining the optimal anticancer treatments in women with ovarian cancer. Systematic Review Registration: https://inplasy.com/, identifier INPLASY202290028.

Indexed as

frailtygeriatric assessmentmeta-analysisovarian cancersurvival

Identifiers

PMID36324564
PMCPMC9618815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.