Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36324555›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2022

Physiotherapy as part of primary health care, Italy.

Alessandra Da Ros, Matteo Paci, Elisa Buonandi, Laura Rosiello, Sandra Moretti, Chiara Barchielli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Advancing rehabilitation through health policy and systems research.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alessandra Da RosScuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Istituto di Management, Laboratorio Management e Sanità, Piazza Martiri della Libertà, 33, 56127 Pisa, Italy.
Matteo PaciDipartimento delle Professioni Tecnico-Sanitarie, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy.
Elisa BuonandiDipartimento delle Professioni Tecnico-Sanitarie, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy.
Laura RosielloDipartimento delle Professioni Tecnico-Sanitarie, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy.
Sandra MorettiDipartimento delle Professioni Tecnico-Sanitarie, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy.
Chiara BarchielliScuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Istituto di Management, Laboratorio Management e Sanità, Piazza Martiri della Libertà, 33, 56127 Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To describe the Family and Community Physiotherapist model, which aims to incorporate rehabilitation services within primary health care in Tuscany, Italy. Methods: The Department of Health Professions of the Central Tuscany local health authority designed the model during 2020-2021. We describe the four phases of the organizational case study implementation of the model, namely: (i) analysis of the political and organizational framework, as well as determination of changing health-care needs; (ii) model co-design and training of multiprofessional health-care workers (local general practitioners, physiatrists and geriatricians); (iii) delivery and surveillance of rehabilitation services; and (iv) evaluation. Findings: During the initial roll-out of the project in April-December 2021, general practitioners referred 165 patients with a mean age of 83.7 years (standard deviation: 11.1) to the Family and Community Physiotherapist. Interventions were mainly activated for patients with comorbidities (64/165; 38.8%), followed by those with long-term immobilization issues (36/165; 21.8%). The most commonly provided intervention was counselling, contributing to the achievement of objectives for 127 patients (77.0%). A full rehabilitation path was proposed for only 10 patients (6.1%). No additional costs were incurred by the health authority during the implementation of the model. Conclusion: Our model facilitated the provision of rehabilitative care in the community, preventing the exacerbation of chronic conditions and meeting the population health needs in non-hospital environments. The model overcame the typical lack of integration within health-care services with flexibility, promoting care proximity solutions to cope with health challenges such as an ageing population and the coronavirus disease.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesAged, 80 and overHealth PersonnelHumansPrimary Health CareReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

PMID36324555
PMCPMC9589380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.