ArticleRSC medicinal chemistry2022
Fragment screening at AstraZeneca: developing the next generation biophysics fragment set.
Article in RSC medicinal chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developments and challenges in hit progression within fragment-based drug discovery.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Macromolecular crystallography from an industrial perspective - the impact of synchrotron radiation on structure-based drug discovery.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2025Article
- Design, quality and validation of the EU-OPENSCREEN fragment library poised to a high-throughput screening collection.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2024Article
- Discovery and Optimization of the First ATP Competitive Type-III c-MET Inhibitor.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2023Article
- E3 Ligases Meet Their Match: Fragment-Based Approaches to Discover New E3 Ligands and to Unravel E3 Biology.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fragment based drug discovery is a critical part of the lead generation toolbox and relies heavily on a readily available, high quality fragment library. Over years of use, the AstraZeneca fragment set had become partially depleted and instances of compound deterioration had been found. It was recognised that a redevelopment was required. This provided an opportunity to evolve our screening sets strategy, whilst ensuring that the quality of the fragment set met the robust requirements of fragment screening campaigns. In this communication we share the strategy employed, in particular highlighting two aspects of our approach that we believe others in the community would benefit from, namely that; (i) fragments were selected with input from Medicinal Chemists at an early stage, and (ii) the library was arranged in a layered format to ensure maximum flexibility on a per target basis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.