Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36324455›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Couple-level determinants of syphilis infection among heterosexual married couples of reproductive age in Guangdong Province, China: A population-based cross-sectional study.

Lu Han, Wenxue Xiong, Mingzhen Li, Rui Li, Jiabao Wu, Xijia Tang, Li Ling, Xiaohua Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lu HanNational Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Male Reproduction and Genetics, Guangdong Provincial Reproductive Science Institute (Guangdong Provincial Fertility Hospital), Guangzhou, China.
Wenxue XiongFaculty of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Mingzhen LiNational Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Male Reproduction and Genetics, Guangdong Provincial Reproductive Science Institute (Guangdong Provincial Fertility Hospital), Guangzhou, China.
Rui LiFaculty of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiabao WuNational Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Male Reproduction and Genetics, Guangdong Provincial Reproductive Science Institute (Guangdong Provincial Fertility Hospital), Guangzhou, China.
Xijia TangFaculty of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Li LingFaculty of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaohua LiuNational Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Male Reproduction and Genetics, Guangdong Provincial Reproductive Science Institute (Guangdong Provincial Fertility Hospital), Guangzhou, China.
Guangdong Provincial Health Commission · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Syphilis remains a major public health problem worldwide, and its prevention requires knowledge of factors that go beyond the individual-level. However, most syphilis-related studies have focused on individual-level and regional-level factors, neglecting couple-level factors. Thus, this study aimed to explore couple-level determinants of syphilis infection among heterosexual married couples. Methods: This population-based cross-sectional study used data from heterosexual married couples who participated in the National Free Preconception Health Examination Project in Guangdong Province, China during 2014-2019. The syphilis infection was tested by the rapid plasma reagin test. Couple-level data were obtained by combining information provided by the man and woman living in the same household. Multivariate logistic models were employed to explore the couple-level determinants of syphilis infection by gender after adjusting for potential confounders. Results: A total of 1,755,156 couples were recruited in this analysis. The seroprevalence was 0.25% (95%CI: 0.24-0.25%) and 0.26% (95%CI: 0.25-0.27%) among men and women, respectively. The median age was 28.0 (interquartile range, IQR: 25.0-31.0) years, and the median duration of marriage was 0.2 (IQR: 0.0-2.5) years. After adjusting for individual and regional-level variables, duration of marriage was a protective factor for syphilis infection in men (adjusted odds ratios, AOR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96-0.98) and women (AOR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.94-0.96). The age gap and the difference in education level between the husband and wife were associated with syphilis infection, but these associations were somewhat different between men and women. Condom use was negatively associated with syphilis infection in men (AOR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.70-0.84) and women (AOR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.71-0.84). Our results also showed that couple mobility and the number of children were not statistically significant determinants of syphilis infection among heterosexual married couples. Conclusion: This study contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of syphilis outcomes in individuals in the context of marriage in China. Several couple-level factors are indeed associated with syphilis infection, but these associations differ between men and women. Couple-based strategies that engage both women and men and efforts to promote condom use among heterosexual married couples need to be developed and further evaluated for syphilis prevention.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSyphilisAdultChildChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHeterosexualityHumansMaleSeroepidemiologic StudiesSpousesChinacouple-leveldeterminantsheterosexual couplesmarried couplessyphilis

Identifiers

PMID36324455
PMCPMC9620861
OpenAlexW4306407626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.