ArticleHealth science reports2022
Dissatisfaction of people with type 2 diabetes with the care received at a diabetes clinic in Ningbo, China: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Health science reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Associated With Satisfaction With Diabetes Care Among Patients Attending Public Diabetic Clinics in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Study.Public health challenges · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Dissatisfaction of people with type 2 diabetes with the care received at a diabetes clinic in Ningbo, China: A cross-sectional study.Health science reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The study aimed to assess the dissatisfaction of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with the care that they received at a diabetes outpatient clinic in Ningbo, China and to determine the associated factors. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 406 adults with T2DM in 2020-2021. Those who were treated at the diabetes outpatient clinic for at least six consecutive months before the survey date were eligible. The Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction scale was used to assess participants' dissatisfaction with the care that they received. Results: Of the participants, 25.1% were not satisfied with the care that they received at the diabetes outpatient clinic in Ningbo. The odds of dissatisfaction were higher in physically active people compared to those who were not (odds ratio [OR]: 3.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56-7.45) and those with >1-5 years of T2DM compared to ≤1 year (OR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.05-4.53). Conclusion: A quarter of people with T2DM were dissatisfied with the care that they received at the diabetes outpatient clinic in Ningbo, China, and the factors associated with dissatisfaction were identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.