Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36324404›Full record

ArticleCerebral circulation - cognition and behavior2022

Research protocol - Assessing Post-Stroke Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (APPLE) study: A prospective cohort study in stroke.

Terence J Quinn, Martin Taylor-Rowan, Emma Elliott, Bogna Drozdowska, David McMahon, Niall M Broomfield, Mark Barber, Mary Joan MacLeod, Vera Cvoro, Anthony Byrne and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Editorial.Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Terence J QuinnInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Martin Taylor-RowanInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Emma ElliottInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Bogna DrozdowskaInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom.
David McMahonInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Niall M BroomfieldDepartment Clinical Psychology and Psychological Therapies, University of East Anglia, United Kingdom.
Mark BarberStroke Unit, University Hospital Monklands, United Kingdom.
Mary Joan MacLeodDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Vera CvoroStroke Unit, Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, United Kingdom.
Anthony ByrneDepartment of Ageing & Health, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, United Kingdom.
Sarah RossStroke Unit, Perth Royal Infirmary, Perth, United Kingdom.
Jennifer CrowImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
Peter SladeMorriston Hospital, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Jesse DawsonInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Peter LanghorneInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cognitive and mood problems have been highlighted as priorities in stroke research and guidelines recommend early screening. However, there is limited detail on the preferred approach.We aimed to (1) determine the optimal methods for evaluating psychological problems that pre-date stroke; (2) assess the test accuracy, feasibility and acceptability of brief cognitive and mood tests used at various time-points following stroke; (3) describe temporal changes in cognition and mood following stroke and explore predictors of change. Methods: We established a multi-centre, prospective, observational cohort with acute stroke as the inception point - Assessing Post-stroke Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (APPLE). We approached patients admitted with stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) from 11 different hospital sites across the United Kingdom. Baseline demographics, clinical, functional, cognitive, and mood data were collected. Consenting stroke survivors were followed up with more extensive evaluations of cognition and mood at 1, 6, 12 and 18 months. Results: Continuous recruitment was from February 2017 to February 2019. With 357 consented to full follow-up. Eighteen-month assessments were completed in September 2020 with permissions in-place for longer term in-person or electronic follow-up. A qualitative study has been completed, and a participant sample biobank and individual participant database are both available. Discussion: The APPLE study will provide guidance on optimal tool selection for cognitive and mood assessment both before and after stroke, as well as information on prognosis and natural history of neuropsychological problems in stroke. The study data, neuroimaging and tissue biobank are all available as a resource for future research.

Indexed as

CognitionCohortDementiaDepressionStrokeVascular cognitive impairment

Identifiers

PMID36324404
PMCPMC9616226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.